J. van Oosterhout
Please Note
3 records found
1
Tele-manipulation of heavy loads typically requires the simultaneous use of two asymmetric slaves: a crane for vertical weight support; and a robot for accurate lateral positioning. The industrial standard prescribes a pair of operators for such tasks (one operator to control each slave), although in principle one operator might control both slaves with a single, hybrid interface. Accurate and safe co-operative handling of the expensive and fragile heavy components is difficult, presumably due to problems in the coordination of the subtasks and the lack of mutual awareness between the two operators. This study proposes a novel haptic assistance system to improve subtask coordination and task performance. Its novelty consists of haptically linking operators/interfaces through the joint task environment. The system's efficacy is evaluated with fifteen pairs of co-operators and fifteen individual uni-manual operators who manoeuvred a heavy load through a bounded path in Virtual Reality. Haptic assistance improves task completion time for both groups. It also reduces control activity and self-reported workload without affecting a number of critical errors made by the operators. Moreover, without haptic assistance, uni-manual operators perform worse than co-operators, but this difference between the interfaces disappears with haptic assistance.
The goal of this thesis is to quantify the impact of interface design choices and haptic assistance to facilitate action coordination between the asymmetric subtasks. Specifically, the interface design choices for single and dual operators will be evaluated with and without haptic assistance, under realistic conditions that incorporate potential inaccuracies in the assistance arising from mismatches between the real and modelled world.
The conclusions are that the interface with two co-operating operator is favourable over the bi- and uni-manual single operator interface to coordinate two asymmetric subtasks that have an interactive nature. A novel haptic assistance system improves both co-operated and uni-manual task performance. Interestingly, the observed favour for the co-operated interface with respect to the uni-manual interface is not found when both are haptically assisted. Moreover, haptic assistance still provides benefits when the support cues become statically or dynamically inaccurate due to heavy load handling.
...
The goal of this thesis is to quantify the impact of interface design choices and haptic assistance to facilitate action coordination between the asymmetric subtasks. Specifically, the interface design choices for single and dual operators will be evaluated with and without haptic assistance, under realistic conditions that incorporate potential inaccuracies in the assistance arising from mismatches between the real and modelled world.
The conclusions are that the interface with two co-operating operator is favourable over the bi- and uni-manual single operator interface to coordinate two asymmetric subtasks that have an interactive nature. A novel haptic assistance system improves both co-operated and uni-manual task performance. Interestingly, the observed favour for the co-operated interface with respect to the uni-manual interface is not found when both are haptically assisted. Moreover, haptic assistance still provides benefits when the support cues become statically or dynamically inaccurate due to heavy load handling.
Tele-manipulation with two asymmetric slaves
Two operators perform better than one
Certain tele-manipulation tasks require manipulation by two asymmetric slaves, for example a crane for hoisting and a dexterous robotic arm for fine manipulation. It is unclear how to best design human-in-the-loop control over two asymmetric slaves. The goal of this paper is to quantitatively compare the standard approach of two co-operating operators that each control a single subtask, to a single operator performing bimanual control over the two subtasks, and a uni-manual control approach.