<p>This page displays the records of the person named above and is not linked to a unique person identifier. This record may need to be merged to a profile.</p>
Conference paper(2025)
-
Philipp Altmann, Jonas Stein, Michael Kolle, Adelina Barligea, Maximilian Zorn, Thomas Gabor, Thomy Phan, Sebastian Feld, Claudia Linnhoff-Popien
Quantum computing (QC) in the current NISQ era is still limited in size and precision. Hybrid applications mitigating those shortcomings are prevalent to gain early insight and advantages. Hybrid quantum machine learning (QML) comprises both the application of QC to improve machine learning (ML) and ML to improve QC architectures. This work considers the latter, leveraging reinforcement learning (RL) to improve quantum circuit design (QCD), which we formalize by a set of generic objectives. Furthermore, we propose qcd-gym, a concrete framework formalized as a Markov decision process, to enable learning policies capable of controlling a universal set of continuously parameterized quantum gates. Finally, we provide benchmark comparisons to assess the shortcomings and strengths of current state-of-the-art RL algorithms.
...
Quantum computing (QC) in the current NISQ era is still limited in size and precision. Hybrid applications mitigating those shortcomings are prevalent to gain early insight and advantages. Hybrid quantum machine learning (QML) comprises both the application of QC to improve machine learning (ML) and ML to improve QC architectures. This work considers the latter, leveraging reinforcement learning (RL) to improve quantum circuit design (QCD), which we formalize by a set of generic objectives. Furthermore, we propose qcd-gym, a concrete framework formalized as a Markov decision process, to enable learning policies capable of controlling a universal set of continuously parameterized quantum gates. Finally, we provide benchmark comparisons to assess the shortcomings and strengths of current state-of-the-art RL algorithms.
Conference paper(2024)
-
Sebastian Zielinski, Maximilian Zorn, Thomas Gabor, Sebastian Feld, Claudia Linnhoff-Popien
A common way of solving satisfiability instances with quantum methods is to transform these instances into instances of QUBO. State-of-the-art transformations from MAX-3SAT to QUBO work by mapping clauses of a 3SAT formula associated with the MAX-3SAT instance to an instance of QUBO and combining the resulting QUBOs into a single QUBO instance representing the whole MAX-3SAT instance. As creating these transformations is currently done manually or via exhaustive search methods and is, therefore, algorithmically inefficient, we see potential for including search-based optimization. In this paper, we propose two methods of using evolutionary algorithms to create QUBO representations of MAX-3SAT problems automatically. We evaluate our created QUBOs on 500 and 1000-clause 3SAT formulae and find competitive performance to state-of-the-art baselines when using both classical and quantum annealing solvers.
...
A common way of solving satisfiability instances with quantum methods is to transform these instances into instances of QUBO. State-of-the-art transformations from MAX-3SAT to QUBO work by mapping clauses of a 3SAT formula associated with the MAX-3SAT instance to an instance of QUBO and combining the resulting QUBOs into a single QUBO instance representing the whole MAX-3SAT instance. As creating these transformations is currently done manually or via exhaustive search methods and is, therefore, algorithmically inefficient, we see potential for including search-based optimization. In this paper, we propose two methods of using evolutionary algorithms to create QUBO representations of MAX-3SAT problems automatically. We evaluate our created QUBOs on 500 and 1000-clause 3SAT formulae and find competitive performance to state-of-the-art baselines when using both classical and quantum annealing solvers.
