Compact and low-cost radar transponders are an attractive alternative to corner reflectors (CRs) for interferometric synthetic aperture radar (InSAR) deformation monitoring, datum connection, and geodetic data integration. Recently, such transponders have become commercially available for C-band sensors, which poses relevant questions on their characteristics in terms of radiometric, geometric, and phase stability. Especially for extended time series and for high-precision geodetic applications, the impact of secular or seasonal effects, such as variations in temperature and humidity, has yet to be proven. In this article, we address these challenges using a multitude of short baseline experiments with four transponders and six CRs deployed at test sites in The Netherlands and Slovakia. Combined together, we analyzed 980 transponder measurements in Sentinel-1 time series to a maximum extent of 21 months. We find an average radar cross section (RCS) of over 42 dBm2 within a range of up to 15° of elevation misalignment, which is comparable to a triangular trihedral CR with a leg length of 2.0 m. Its RCS shows the temporal variations of 0.3-0.7 dBm2 (standard deviation), which is partially correlated with surface temperature changes. The precision of the InSAR phase double differences over short baselines between a transponder and a stable reference CRs is found to be 0.5-1.2 mm (one sigma). We observe a correlation with surface temperature, leading to seasonal variations of up to ±3 mm, which should be modeled and corrected for in high-precision InSAR applications. For precise SAR positioning, we observe antenna-specific constant internal electronic delays of 1.2-2.1 m in slant range, i.e., within the range resolution of the Sentinel-1 interferometric wide (IW) product, with a temporal variability of less than 20 cm. Comparing similar transponders from the same series, we observe distinct differences in performance. Our main conclusion is that these characteristics are favorable for a wide range of geodetic applications. For particular demanding applications, individual calibration of single devices is strongly recommended.

Artificial radar reflectors, such as corner reflectors or transponders, are commonly used for radiometric and geometric Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) sensor calibration, SAR interferometry (InSAR) applications over areas with few natural coherent scatterers, and InSAR datum connection and geodetic integration. Despite the current abundance of regular SAR time series, no free and open-source software (FOSS) dedicated to analyzing SAR time series of artificial radar reflectors exists. In this paper, we present a FOSS Python toolbox for efficient and automatic estimation of: (i) the clutter level of a particular site before a corner reflector installation, (ii) the Radar Cross Section (RCS) to track a corner reflector’s performance and detect outliers, for example, due to damage or debris accumulation, (iii) the Signal-to-Clutter Ratio (SCR) to predict the positioning precision and the InSAR phase variance, (iv) the InSAR displacement time series of a corner reflector network. We use the toolbox to analyze Sentinel-1 SAR time series of the network of 23 corner reflectors for InSAR monitoring of landslides in Slovakia.

The estimation of Signal-to-Clutter Ratio (SCR) of a radar point target, such as a corner reflector, is an essential step for synthetic aperture radar (SAR) interferometry and positioning, as it influences the phase measurement variance as well as the absolute positioning precision. The standard method to estimate the SCR of a point target relies on the debatable assumption of spatial ergodicity, using the clutter of the surrounding as representative of the clutter at the point target. Here, we estimate the SCR of a corner reflector using a time series of SAR measurements, i.e.,\ assuming temporal ergodicity. This assumption is often more realistic, particularly in a complex environment, in the presence of other point scatterers, and for small-sized reflectors. Empirical results on a corner reflector network, using Sentinel-1 SAR measurements, show that the temporal method yields a less biased and more precise estimate of the average SCR. A second experiment shows that the InSAR phase variance as well as positioning precision, predicted using SCR estimated by the temporal estimation method, is closer to the truth.