G.S. Celik
Please Note
7 records found
1
Negotiating Democracy
Exploring future relationships between young people and democracy through the evolving role of identity and belonging
Aim and relevance
This graduation project explores how young people may relate to democracy in
2035 and how design can support them in recognising, practising and contributing
to democratic life. The project starts from growing concern about democratic
decline. International research describes continuing autocratisation and pressure on
democratic rights, representation and participation (Nord et al., 2025; International
IDEA, 2025). In the Netherlands, democracy remains relatively strong, while trust in
politicians and the House of Representatives has declined substantially (CBS, 2026).
Rather than approaching democracy only as a political system, this project
understands it as a way of living together. Young people encounter democracy
not only through elections and institutions, but also by follwing rules, having
disagreement, when belonging to a group, when feeling influence of your context and
being responsible for the things happening in your life. This perspective is especially
relevant during adolescence, when democratic attitudes develop alongside identity,
autonomy and relationships with peers (Van der Meer et al., 2024; Meeus, 2011).
ProDemos, a Dutch organisation that provides education about democracy and the
rule of law, forms the design context for exploring what this could mean for
democratic education.
Method
The project follows the Vision in Product Design approach (Hekkert & Van Dijk,
2011), using design to first understand and reframe the context before developing
interventions. The existing ProDemos instrumentarium was studied through
programme materials, observations and interviews with guides and programme
makers. This was followed by future-oriented research towards 2035. Interviews,
conversations with young people and professionals, input sessions, observations,
lectures, performances and desk research were translated into 159 context factors and
clustered into 14 clusters.
These clusters were used to construct a framework of plausible future relationships
between young people and democracy. The framework and later design directions
were further developed through conversations with researchers, education experts,
political and institutional experts, as well as design sessions and tests with young
people and ProDemos education experts.
Results
Two dimensions became central in understanding the possible future relationships.
The first describes how graspable the world around a young person feels, ranging
from clear and structured to contested or difficult to grasp. The second describes
how a young person relates to a group: moving along with it, taking an own position,
or withdrawing from it. Together, these dimensions create nine possible behavioural
positions. These positions are not mutually exclusive: a young person may move
between them or encounter several of them across different situations.
The nine behavioural positions informed the development of nine democratic
capacities. These describe what young people may need to practise when navigating
democratic situations: choosing consciously within guided systems, daring to take a
position within a group, contributing to the system they depend on, pausing before
reacting, acting without knowing all possible consequences, understanding that
fairness feels different for everyone, building shared orientation within uncertainty,
connecting across differences, and feeling part of something larger than themselves.
The capacities are intended to develop through repeated practice and across different
situations in young people’s lives.
This led to a reframing of the design challenge. Instead of focusing on separate
democratic experiences, the project proposes recurring democratic practice across
situations young people already encounter: ‘experiencing’. A school rule, a decision
at a sports club, becoming eighteen or a disagreement about a shared place can
become an opportunity to practise a democratic capacity.
Conclusion
The resulting concept, Lieve Toekomst, is a programme for a recurring practice. It
supports educators and other makers in recognising everyday situations, selecting
a democratic capacity and turning that combination into a concrete educational
intervention. A practical booklet and first collection of examples make the programme
usable today. The shared identity, feedback loop and roadmap describe how separate
practice moments could become connected across places where young people
already are.
The project therefore proposes a broader role for ProDemos. Knowledge about
institutions, rights and procedures remains important, but young people also need
opportunities to practise how they position themselves, relate to others and act within
uncertain situations. Lieve Toekomst provides an instrumentarium for creating these
opportunities while leaving the content of the democratic future open. Young people
are prepared for that future by practising democracy in the situations they already
share with others today.
...
Aim and relevance
This graduation project explores how young people may relate to democracy in
2035 and how design can support them in recognising, practising and contributing
to democratic life. The project starts from growing concern about democratic
decline. International research describes continuing autocratisation and pressure on
democratic rights, representation and participation (Nord et al., 2025; International
IDEA, 2025). In the Netherlands, democracy remains relatively strong, while trust in
politicians and the House of Representatives has declined substantially (CBS, 2026).
Rather than approaching democracy only as a political system, this project
understands it as a way of living together. Young people encounter democracy
not only through elections and institutions, but also by follwing rules, having
disagreement, when belonging to a group, when feeling influence of your context and
being responsible for the things happening in your life. This perspective is especially
relevant during adolescence, when democratic attitudes develop alongside identity,
autonomy and relationships with peers (Van der Meer et al., 2024; Meeus, 2011).
ProDemos, a Dutch organisation that provides education about democracy and the
rule of law, forms the design context for exploring what this could mean for
democratic education.
Method
The project follows the Vision in Product Design approach (Hekkert & Van Dijk,
2011), using design to first understand and reframe the context before developing
interventions. The existing ProDemos instrumentarium was studied through
programme materials, observations and interviews with guides and programme
makers. This was followed by future-oriented research towards 2035. Interviews,
conversations with young people and professionals, input sessions, observations,
lectures, performances and desk research were translated into 159 context factors and
clustered into 14 clusters.
These clusters were used to construct a framework of plausible future relationships
between young people and democracy. The framework and later design directions
were further developed through conversations with researchers, education experts,
political and institutional experts, as well as design sessions and tests with young
people and ProDemos education experts.
Results
Two dimensions became central in understanding the possible future relationships.
The first describes how graspable the world around a young person feels, ranging
from clear and structured to contested or difficult to grasp. The second describes
how a young person relates to a group: moving along with it, taking an own position,
or withdrawing from it. Together, these dimensions create nine possible behavioural
positions. These positions are not mutually exclusive: a young person may move
between them or encounter several of them across different situations.
The nine behavioural positions informed the development of nine democratic
capacities. These describe what young people may need to practise when navigating
democratic situations: choosing consciously within guided systems, daring to take a
position within a group, contributing to the system they depend on, pausing before
reacting, acting without knowing all possible consequences, understanding that
fairness feels different for everyone, building shared orientation within uncertainty,
connecting across differences, and feeling part of something larger than themselves.
The capacities are intended to develop through repeated practice and across different
situations in young people’s lives.
This led to a reframing of the design challenge. Instead of focusing on separate
democratic experiences, the project proposes recurring democratic practice across
situations young people already encounter: ‘experiencing’. A school rule, a decision
at a sports club, becoming eighteen or a disagreement about a shared place can
become an opportunity to practise a democratic capacity.
Conclusion
The resulting concept, Lieve Toekomst, is a programme for a recurring practice. It
supports educators and other makers in recognising everyday situations, selecting
a democratic capacity and turning that combination into a concrete educational
intervention. A practical booklet and first collection of examples make the programme
usable today. The shared identity, feedback loop and roadmap describe how separate
practice moments could become connected across places where young people
already are.
The project therefore proposes a broader role for ProDemos. Knowledge about
institutions, rights and procedures remains important, but young people also need
opportunities to practise how they position themselves, relate to others and act within
uncertain situations. Lieve Toekomst provides an instrumentarium for creating these
opportunities while leaving the content of the democratic future open. Young people
are prepared for that future by practising democracy in the situations they already
share with others today.
From intent to impact
Designing ways for early-stage start-ups to monitor and communicate impact
This graduation project, conducted with the Secrid Impact Fund and its start-ups, asks how early-stage, mission-driven start-ups can be supported in assessing and communicating their impact in a way that fits their context and development stage. Through a literature review, an analysis of existing impact frameworks, and exploratory research with founders, five recurring limitations were identified: existing frameworks fail to capture qualitative and narrative impact, are overwhelming, are ill-suited to experimental ventures, are not embedded in daily practice, and insufficiently capture systemic change.
In response, the project developed Trace, an impact companion that travels with a venture across its year in the Fund. Trace combines an app for capturing small moments of impact as they happen, a quarterly report that turns those moments into structured reflection, and a set of impact games that establish a shared language at kick-off. Grounded in systemic-design theory, Trace reframes impact measurement from a periodic accountability task into an everyday, narrative-driven steering mechanism for founders. ...
This graduation project, conducted with the Secrid Impact Fund and its start-ups, asks how early-stage, mission-driven start-ups can be supported in assessing and communicating their impact in a way that fits their context and development stage. Through a literature review, an analysis of existing impact frameworks, and exploratory research with founders, five recurring limitations were identified: existing frameworks fail to capture qualitative and narrative impact, are overwhelming, are ill-suited to experimental ventures, are not embedded in daily practice, and insufficiently capture systemic change.
In response, the project developed Trace, an impact companion that travels with a venture across its year in the Fund. Trace combines an app for capturing small moments of impact as they happen, a quarterly report that turns those moments into structured reflection, and a set of impact games that establish a shared language at kick-off. Grounded in systemic-design theory, Trace reframes impact measurement from a periodic accountability task into an everyday, narrative-driven steering mechanism for founders.
Empowering Energy Hubs
A strategic pathway for stakeholder collaboration and hydrogen adoption to mitigate grid congestion
This research shows that the lack of collaboration, due to misalignment of interests of network operators (DSOs) and and EH collectives, is a critical factor that delays the development of EHs. This research explores how design, especially strategic and participatory design, can play a role in addressing these challenges. The goal is to understand how collaboration between DSOs and EH collectives can be designed to facilitate battery storage integration in Dutch business terrains. This is done through a literature review, stakeholder interviews, and participatory co-creative workshops.
The literature review showed that EHs can be considered to consist of four interconnected elements: technology, organization, regulation and finance. Each element influences the others, revealing a web of dependencies that must be managed strategically, as battery operations can also pose a risk for grid congestion. Interviews showed that actors in the system differ in drivers and barriers. Four main tensions were identified:
- Operational control of batteries,
- Capacity allocation,
- Risk allocation,
- Uncertainties in emerging contracts
Co-creative workshops with different stakeholders offered a way to discuss these tensions and align interests. In the workshop, two decision-making scenarios were explored and evaluated: DSO-led flexibility and EH-led flexibility. Results showed that stakeholders generally preferred a hybrid future, where DSOs act as facilitators and the EHs have control over battery use. Participants emphasized the need for EH authority, mutual trust, fairness of compensation and reliability of the systems. The workshop also revealed boundary conditions to achieve these needed values and move toward grid integration of battery-based EHs. Based on these insights, two tools to support EH developers, DSOs, and regulators in navigating the complexity have been developed:
- A morphological chart that shows options of the EH configuration
- A roadmap showing steps for each aspect of the EH toward system integration
This thesis contributes to the energy transition by offering a deeper understanding of the problem, a shared vision for the preferred future, and clear requirements to achieve it.
...
This research shows that the lack of collaboration, due to misalignment of interests of network operators (DSOs) and and EH collectives, is a critical factor that delays the development of EHs. This research explores how design, especially strategic and participatory design, can play a role in addressing these challenges. The goal is to understand how collaboration between DSOs and EH collectives can be designed to facilitate battery storage integration in Dutch business terrains. This is done through a literature review, stakeholder interviews, and participatory co-creative workshops.
The literature review showed that EHs can be considered to consist of four interconnected elements: technology, organization, regulation and finance. Each element influences the others, revealing a web of dependencies that must be managed strategically, as battery operations can also pose a risk for grid congestion. Interviews showed that actors in the system differ in drivers and barriers. Four main tensions were identified:
- Operational control of batteries,
- Capacity allocation,
- Risk allocation,
- Uncertainties in emerging contracts
Co-creative workshops with different stakeholders offered a way to discuss these tensions and align interests. In the workshop, two decision-making scenarios were explored and evaluated: DSO-led flexibility and EH-led flexibility. Results showed that stakeholders generally preferred a hybrid future, where DSOs act as facilitators and the EHs have control over battery use. Participants emphasized the need for EH authority, mutual trust, fairness of compensation and reliability of the systems. The workshop also revealed boundary conditions to achieve these needed values and move toward grid integration of battery-based EHs. Based on these insights, two tools to support EH developers, DSOs, and regulators in navigating the complexity have been developed:
- A morphological chart that shows options of the EH configuration
- A roadmap showing steps for each aspect of the EH toward system integration
This thesis contributes to the energy transition by offering a deeper understanding of the problem, a shared vision for the preferred future, and clear requirements to achieve it.
Beyond street harassment
Cultivating agency over the public space for young people in Rotterdam
The aim of this project is to design for understanding and reducing street harassment behavior among young people in Rotterdam. In 2020, nearly half (47%) of the women surveyed in Rotterdam, reported being targets of street harassment (Fischer et al., 2021). Street harassment is a persistent and normalized form of gender-based violence in public spaces that can have severe effects on the target. In Rotterdam, young people aged 15–25 are not only disproportionately targeted but are also often the perpetrators. Current interventions have focused primarily on supporting targets and bystanders or on raising awareness but often fail to address the social structures that sustain the behavior. This project addresses a critical gap: the lack of understanding about why young people engage in street harassment.
Method
To address the complexity of the topic, I used a combination of multiple design methods and practices. To better understand the social structures surrounding street harassment, I adopted a systemic design approach. To better understand the context of young people in Rotterdam, I adopted a participatory approach. Activities included, but were not limited to, stakeholder interviews (n=5), guerilla street interviews (n=27), two generative sessions with young people in youth hubs (n=7, n=12), testing the design proposal three times (n=3, n=5, n=5) and interviews with relevant stakeholders to evaluate the design proposal (n=5).
Results
The research showed that street harassment is difficult to tackle because it is deeply normalized and sustained by intersecting structures of inequality, like gender inequality, racism, and classism. It is not an isolated behavior, but is entangled with broader systems of inequality and identity formation that unfold in public space. When in public space, young people experience and reinforce these inequalities, but are unable to challenge them. Resulting from a lack of accessibility, agency and ownership in regard to their environment, young people conform to the status quo: a culture of inequality, in which street harassment is normal.
Therefore, the design proposal, a workshop, aims to increase young people’s sense of agency over the public space by enabling them to contribute to shaping public spaces in a way that is both fitting and valuable for them. Through engaging in speculative design practices, I created alternative futures of public space, made tangible in the form of scenarios and objects. In the workshop, young people engage with these scenarios and objects. Through discussions about the meaning and the consequences of these futures, they share their dreams and concerns about their own neighborhood.
Conclusion
Iteratively testing the workshop showed that the process is highly engaging and encouraged participants to think critically, listen to others and reconsider their own views. The design proposal enables urban developers and planners to gain insights into the preferences and priorities of various groups of youth, opening the door for more diverse and representative youth participation overall.
By shifting focus from punitive measures to cultivating agency, this project reframed young people not as part of the problem, but as a part of the solution. The project demonstrated two main things: the potential of speculative design as a tool for meaningful youth participation on public space, and that young people are willing and more than capable to contribute to societal issues it is framed accessibly and when they are taken seriously. With the right follow-up, the workshop has the potential to not just inform, but to activate as well. It can make young people feel seen, heard, and more aware of their role in shaping the future. More than anything, the workshop is a way to take young people seriously and to position them as valuable contributors to society.
...
The aim of this project is to design for understanding and reducing street harassment behavior among young people in Rotterdam. In 2020, nearly half (47%) of the women surveyed in Rotterdam, reported being targets of street harassment (Fischer et al., 2021). Street harassment is a persistent and normalized form of gender-based violence in public spaces that can have severe effects on the target. In Rotterdam, young people aged 15–25 are not only disproportionately targeted but are also often the perpetrators. Current interventions have focused primarily on supporting targets and bystanders or on raising awareness but often fail to address the social structures that sustain the behavior. This project addresses a critical gap: the lack of understanding about why young people engage in street harassment.
Method
To address the complexity of the topic, I used a combination of multiple design methods and practices. To better understand the social structures surrounding street harassment, I adopted a systemic design approach. To better understand the context of young people in Rotterdam, I adopted a participatory approach. Activities included, but were not limited to, stakeholder interviews (n=5), guerilla street interviews (n=27), two generative sessions with young people in youth hubs (n=7, n=12), testing the design proposal three times (n=3, n=5, n=5) and interviews with relevant stakeholders to evaluate the design proposal (n=5).
Results
The research showed that street harassment is difficult to tackle because it is deeply normalized and sustained by intersecting structures of inequality, like gender inequality, racism, and classism. It is not an isolated behavior, but is entangled with broader systems of inequality and identity formation that unfold in public space. When in public space, young people experience and reinforce these inequalities, but are unable to challenge them. Resulting from a lack of accessibility, agency and ownership in regard to their environment, young people conform to the status quo: a culture of inequality, in which street harassment is normal.
Therefore, the design proposal, a workshop, aims to increase young people’s sense of agency over the public space by enabling them to contribute to shaping public spaces in a way that is both fitting and valuable for them. Through engaging in speculative design practices, I created alternative futures of public space, made tangible in the form of scenarios and objects. In the workshop, young people engage with these scenarios and objects. Through discussions about the meaning and the consequences of these futures, they share their dreams and concerns about their own neighborhood.
Conclusion
Iteratively testing the workshop showed that the process is highly engaging and encouraged participants to think critically, listen to others and reconsider their own views. The design proposal enables urban developers and planners to gain insights into the preferences and priorities of various groups of youth, opening the door for more diverse and representative youth participation overall.
By shifting focus from punitive measures to cultivating agency, this project reframed young people not as part of the problem, but as a part of the solution. The project demonstrated two main things: the potential of speculative design as a tool for meaningful youth participation on public space, and that young people are willing and more than capable to contribute to societal issues it is framed accessibly and when they are taken seriously. With the right follow-up, the workshop has the potential to not just inform, but to activate as well. It can make young people feel seen, heard, and more aware of their role in shaping the future. More than anything, the workshop is a way to take young people seriously and to position them as valuable contributors to society.
Designing organisational processes through strategic interventions
The learning experience of Board of Innovation
This Master Thesis presents a journey of exploration through the internal and external environments in which the organisation operates and provides with new organisational processes that will reshape the present and the future of Board of Innovation; strategically creating new structures that focus on the learning experience of current and new employees of the organisation.
...
This Master Thesis presents a journey of exploration through the internal and external environments in which the organisation operates and provides with new organisational processes that will reshape the present and the future of Board of Innovation; strategically creating new structures that focus on the learning experience of current and new employees of the organisation.