W.P. de Boer
Please Note
9 records found
1
In this study, we derived the Satellite-Derived Beach Width (SDBW) as the cross-shore distance between the Satellite-Derived Shoreline (SDS) and the Satellite-Derived Vegetation line (SDV). We adopted a widely used and validated method for SDS detection and adapted this method to establish the SDV detection method. The SDS and SDV are derived from optical satellites by deriving vectors from the border between two contrasting land cover types that are identified by differences in (sun)light reflectance values. The SDS and is derived from the contrast between water and land, the SDV from the contrast between and sand/sediment and vegetation. The SDBW data was measured from both composite and individual satellite images. The different techniques are suited for different applications, and both have their advantages and disadvantages. A composite image is an image that is composed of a sequence of individual satellite images available within a set window. E.g., a composite is the average image of all those images. Recent research showed that, at the cost of temporal resolution, composite images are suited for analysis of long-term (structural) shoreline trends since they mitigate certain factors influencing image quality (such as clouds and cloud shadows, waves and tides, and satellite instrument errors). Individual images are better suited for analyses of short-term dynamics since they provide instantaneous measurement data. However, they are hampered more by the factors mentioned above, and hence need to be screened before use...
...
In this study, we derived the Satellite-Derived Beach Width (SDBW) as the cross-shore distance between the Satellite-Derived Shoreline (SDS) and the Satellite-Derived Vegetation line (SDV). We adopted a widely used and validated method for SDS detection and adapted this method to establish the SDV detection method. The SDS and SDV are derived from optical satellites by deriving vectors from the border between two contrasting land cover types that are identified by differences in (sun)light reflectance values. The SDS and is derived from the contrast between water and land, the SDV from the contrast between and sand/sediment and vegetation. The SDBW data was measured from both composite and individual satellite images. The different techniques are suited for different applications, and both have their advantages and disadvantages. A composite image is an image that is composed of a sequence of individual satellite images available within a set window. E.g., a composite is the average image of all those images. Recent research showed that, at the cost of temporal resolution, composite images are suited for analysis of long-term (structural) shoreline trends since they mitigate certain factors influencing image quality (such as clouds and cloud shadows, waves and tides, and satellite instrument errors). Individual images are better suited for analyses of short-term dynamics since they provide instantaneous measurement data. However, they are hampered more by the factors mentioned above, and hence need to be screened before use...
Mapping port operability indicators across the world
Screening the suitability of port locations related to metocean conditions
Deriving Beach Grain Size from Satellite Imagery
A multimethod approach for deriving intertidal beach slopes and sediment grain sizes for different coastal environments
Planetary-scale classification of natural and human-induced sandy shoreline evolution
A semi-automated method that employs Machine Learning and Satellite Derived Shorelines over the past decades
Due to climate change and sea level risethe coastal zones are getting exposed to increasing risks like coastalrecession, putting in risk human lives and coastal infrastructure being worthbillions of dollars. Low lying countries like the Netherlands are consideredmore vulnerable to the effects of sea level rise. Large parts of the Dutchcoast have been eroding for centuries and nourishments schemes of approximately12 million m3 have been implemented annually in order to maintainthe coastline as it was in 1990. However, the future dune erosion will further increasedue to the impacts of climate change and hence the adaptation strategies shouldbe in line with the accelerated sea level rise and the possible effects thatmay bring. The most commonly used method to assess sealevel rise impacts on shorelines is the Bruun rule. However,Bruun rule’s deterministic nature cannot align with the risk-based framework thatcoastal zone management requires nowadays. This necessity initiated thedevelopment of a process-based model, the Probabilistic Coastline Recession(PCR) model, estimating the future coastal recessions in a probabilisticapproach. In this research, the PCR framework wasapplied at eleven locations along the Holland coast, in the Netherlands, underthree different SLR scenarios, the RCP4.5, RCP8.5 and Deltascenario. The availabilityof coastal profile data (from 1965 until now) and coastline position data (from1843 till 1980) made the Holland coast an ideal location to explore and extendthe applicability of the PCR framework. The most relevant assumptions for thiscoast were identified and explored. The recovery rate of the dune was a weakpoint of the PCR model and Holland coast was an interesting area to be tested.Three approaches of calibrating the natural recovery rate of the dunes werefollowed. In addition, the alongshore sediment transport which was assumednegligible to the previous case studies, in this work it was integrated intothe PCR model and pointed out that its contribution is important to the PCR. For the eleven selected coastal profiles,20,000 simulations of 81 years (2020-2100) have been conducted and for everysimulation the most landward position of the coastline in every calendar yearhas been recorded. Hence, an empirical distribution of coastline recession forevery future year has been constructed. The ranges of the expected retreats in2100 (relative to 2020) for the different SLR scenarios are:0.5 m-155 m (for RCP4.5), 6 m-194 m (for RCP8.5) and18 m-172 m (for Deltascenario), corresponding to the 50 %exceedance probability values of the cumulative distribution function of thecoastline retreat. The average values of the coastal retreat for 2100 are 61 m,73 m and 97 m for RCP4.5, RCP 8.5, and Deltascenario respectively.The relevant average erosion volume by 2100 are 1664 m3/m,2005 m3/m and 2665 m3/m. According to thefindings, in 2100 the relative increase in volume loss along the entire theHolland coast is expected to be 95 %, 121 % and 173 %respectively for RCP4.5, 138 % for RCP8.5 and 195 % for Deltascenario.Finally, the results were compared to those raised from the Bruun rule method. Accordingto the findings, the majority of the profiles showing an erosive trend in thepast (before the ‘hold-the-line’ policy) raised slightly more conservativeresults when implementing the PCR model rather than when applying the Bruunrule method- especially under the Deltascenario. On the other hand, theBruun rule method is more conservative than PCR model for most of the accretiveprofiles. The PCR model can now be explored tolocations where the longshore sediment transport is not negligible. Theapproach followed in this study allows investigating the ability of the modelfor future coastal retreat estimates when a construction of a hard defence structureor a port may change abruptly the longshore sediment transport. Last, this studyadvances the PCR framework and can be a valuable assistance in the course offurther improving the model. ...
Due to climate change and sea level risethe coastal zones are getting exposed to increasing risks like coastalrecession, putting in risk human lives and coastal infrastructure being worthbillions of dollars. Low lying countries like the Netherlands are consideredmore vulnerable to the effects of sea level rise. Large parts of the Dutchcoast have been eroding for centuries and nourishments schemes of approximately12 million m3 have been implemented annually in order to maintainthe coastline as it was in 1990. However, the future dune erosion will further increasedue to the impacts of climate change and hence the adaptation strategies shouldbe in line with the accelerated sea level rise and the possible effects thatmay bring. The most commonly used method to assess sealevel rise impacts on shorelines is the Bruun rule. However,Bruun rule’s deterministic nature cannot align with the risk-based framework thatcoastal zone management requires nowadays. This necessity initiated thedevelopment of a process-based model, the Probabilistic Coastline Recession(PCR) model, estimating the future coastal recessions in a probabilisticapproach. In this research, the PCR framework wasapplied at eleven locations along the Holland coast, in the Netherlands, underthree different SLR scenarios, the RCP4.5, RCP8.5 and Deltascenario. The availabilityof coastal profile data (from 1965 until now) and coastline position data (from1843 till 1980) made the Holland coast an ideal location to explore and extendthe applicability of the PCR framework. The most relevant assumptions for thiscoast were identified and explored. The recovery rate of the dune was a weakpoint of the PCR model and Holland coast was an interesting area to be tested.Three approaches of calibrating the natural recovery rate of the dunes werefollowed. In addition, the alongshore sediment transport which was assumednegligible to the previous case studies, in this work it was integrated intothe PCR model and pointed out that its contribution is important to the PCR. For the eleven selected coastal profiles,20,000 simulations of 81 years (2020-2100) have been conducted and for everysimulation the most landward position of the coastline in every calendar yearhas been recorded. Hence, an empirical distribution of coastline recession forevery future year has been constructed. The ranges of the expected retreats in2100 (relative to 2020) for the different SLR scenarios are:0.5 m-155 m (for RCP4.5), 6 m-194 m (for RCP8.5) and18 m-172 m (for Deltascenario), corresponding to the 50 %exceedance probability values of the cumulative distribution function of thecoastline retreat. The average values of the coastal retreat for 2100 are 61 m,73 m and 97 m for RCP4.5, RCP 8.5, and Deltascenario respectively.The relevant average erosion volume by 2100 are 1664 m3/m,2005 m3/m and 2665 m3/m. According to thefindings, in 2100 the relative increase in volume loss along the entire theHolland coast is expected to be 95 %, 121 % and 173 %respectively for RCP4.5, 138 % for RCP8.5 and 195 % for Deltascenario.Finally, the results were compared to those raised from the Bruun rule method. Accordingto the findings, the majority of the profiles showing an erosive trend in thepast (before the ‘hold-the-line’ policy) raised slightly more conservativeresults when implementing the PCR model rather than when applying the Bruunrule method- especially under the Deltascenario. On the other hand, theBruun rule method is more conservative than PCR model for most of the accretiveprofiles. The PCR model can now be explored tolocations where the longshore sediment transport is not negligible. Theapproach followed in this study allows investigating the ability of the modelfor future coastal retreat estimates when a construction of a hard defence structureor a port may change abruptly the longshore sediment transport. Last, this studyadvances the PCR framework and can be a valuable assistance in the course offurther improving the model.
Coastline evolution around African seaports
An evidence database from space
According to the World Port Index, 165 African seaports (after excluding river ports, offshore platforms and anchorages from 266 African ports) are identified. Only 125 ports at sandy coastlines, where SDS detection has been validated, are focused in this research. The results from this study show that coastline evolution, especially coastal area erosion, around the majority of African seaports is limited by the narrow sandy beach and rocky substratum of Afro-trailing coasts. However, there are still some ports at sediment-rich coasts having dramatic erosion and/or siltation hazards. After analysing common characteristics of these high-hazard ports, lessons are learnt for port development. Regarding site selection and breakwater design, ports with massive river sediment supply and/or ports at open coasts have larger negative coastal impacts. For coasts with river sediment supply, it is better to construct ports at the up-drift side of the river mouth to avoid interruption of river supplied sediment transport, which is found helpful for ports around West Mediterranean Sea. Shoreline management plan should be coupled with methods to maintain or increase river sediment supply, which can be learnt from shoreline retreating around ports in West Africa. Furthermore, to reduce coastal impacts around ports, port breakwaters at open coasts should be carefully designed regarding length and orientation to achieve a smaller shore-normal projected length, especially when the gross longshore wave power is massive. Regarding mitigation methods for coastline evolution impacts, shoreline protection structures are effective in reducing erosion hazards in the time scale of 30 years. Extension of the port breakwater (s) can be a temporary solution to mitigate the potential siltation problem but to reduce the down-drift erosion problem at the same time, sediment by-pass system, which is proved to be successful in South African ports, can be designed. ...
According to the World Port Index, 165 African seaports (after excluding river ports, offshore platforms and anchorages from 266 African ports) are identified. Only 125 ports at sandy coastlines, where SDS detection has been validated, are focused in this research. The results from this study show that coastline evolution, especially coastal area erosion, around the majority of African seaports is limited by the narrow sandy beach and rocky substratum of Afro-trailing coasts. However, there are still some ports at sediment-rich coasts having dramatic erosion and/or siltation hazards. After analysing common characteristics of these high-hazard ports, lessons are learnt for port development. Regarding site selection and breakwater design, ports with massive river sediment supply and/or ports at open coasts have larger negative coastal impacts. For coasts with river sediment supply, it is better to construct ports at the up-drift side of the river mouth to avoid interruption of river supplied sediment transport, which is found helpful for ports around West Mediterranean Sea. Shoreline management plan should be coupled with methods to maintain or increase river sediment supply, which can be learnt from shoreline retreating around ports in West Africa. Furthermore, to reduce coastal impacts around ports, port breakwaters at open coasts should be carefully designed regarding length and orientation to achieve a smaller shore-normal projected length, especially when the gross longshore wave power is massive. Regarding mitigation methods for coastline evolution impacts, shoreline protection structures are effective in reducing erosion hazards in the time scale of 30 years. Extension of the port breakwater (s) can be a temporary solution to mitigate the potential siltation problem but to reduce the down-drift erosion problem at the same time, sediment by-pass system, which is proved to be successful in South African ports, can be designed.
The scope of the present study is to understand the influence of reduced wave climate on simulated morphological evolution. Input reduction algorithms, sequencing methods, number of cases and duration of the reduced wave climate were investigated and evaluated with a 1D (cross-shore) brute force simulation of 3.3 years in Noordwijk, Netherlands. Noordwijk is a wave-dominated sandy beach characterized by a double sandbar system that has an inter-annual net offshore migration. The assessment of the methods was carried out through cumulative skill scores, temporal evolution of profile perturbations (bars and troughs) and profiles at the end of the simulation.
Furthermore, the findings on the Dutch coast were validated with a 1 year-long, 1D (cross-shore) brute force simulation in Anmok beach, South Korea. Anmok is a wave-dominated sandy beach with crescentic bars in the nearshore morphological evolution.
One of the conclusions of the present study is that input reduction methods that have more control on the definition of bins such as pre-definition of wave height and wave direction bins perform better than methods that are based fully on the statistical properties of the wave dataset. Also, the order of the wave cases in the reduced wave climate must resemble at its best the natural variability of the full wave climate. Finally, a less robust reduced wave climate (with less representative wave conditions) applied in a smaller timescale performs better in terms of morphology than a more robust reduced wave climate (with more representative wave conditions) applied in longer time-scales.
...
The scope of the present study is to understand the influence of reduced wave climate on simulated morphological evolution. Input reduction algorithms, sequencing methods, number of cases and duration of the reduced wave climate were investigated and evaluated with a 1D (cross-shore) brute force simulation of 3.3 years in Noordwijk, Netherlands. Noordwijk is a wave-dominated sandy beach characterized by a double sandbar system that has an inter-annual net offshore migration. The assessment of the methods was carried out through cumulative skill scores, temporal evolution of profile perturbations (bars and troughs) and profiles at the end of the simulation.
Furthermore, the findings on the Dutch coast were validated with a 1 year-long, 1D (cross-shore) brute force simulation in Anmok beach, South Korea. Anmok is a wave-dominated sandy beach with crescentic bars in the nearshore morphological evolution.
One of the conclusions of the present study is that input reduction methods that have more control on the definition of bins such as pre-definition of wave height and wave direction bins perform better than methods that are based fully on the statistical properties of the wave dataset. Also, the order of the wave cases in the reduced wave climate must resemble at its best the natural variability of the full wave climate. Finally, a less robust reduced wave climate (with less representative wave conditions) applied in a smaller timescale performs better in terms of morphology than a more robust reduced wave climate (with more representative wave conditions) applied in longer time-scales.
Wave dynamics behind a shore-normal breakwater
Towards better understanding and modelling of coastal impacts at sandy coasts
In coastal engineering, numerical models are used to predict the impact of coastal constructions like breakwaters. High detailed models which take for all physical processes into account will result in accurate predictions but result in large computation times. Simplified models have smaller computation times and are more suitable for coastal impact predictions on larger spatial (10 - 100 km) and temporal (decades) scale. The objective of the thesis is to improve the coastline change predictions of models at decadal scale by reviewing the common practice and a new, very fast, module for lee-side wave computations and investigating different wave processes that can improve the wave modelling. This research will focus on (1) understanding of what wave processes are important for the coastline change and (2) advise on what models to use for which conditions and how to the improve model predictions.
The approach of this thesis is triple. First five different modelling approaches for wave modelling are compared, varying in computation time and usability, to a very accurate model that will be used as ground truth. The wave conditions will vary in direction and both wind waves and swell waves will be modelled. From this step de accuracy of these models for different wave conditions can be analyzed. The second step is to get an better understanding of the processes that are involved with the wave modelling. This information can be used to improve the accuracy of model approaches with high computation times. The last step is to see how this relates to sediment transport and thus the coastline change at the lee-side of a breakwater.
This can be concluded after the investigation of 3 wave model (SWASH, SWAN and the Kamphuis module)
SWAN model approach is for cases with wind waves a good model approach: the wave height, wave direction and the sediment transport are well representative. Also the setup differences are very similar to the ground truth model.
SWAN is not very accurate for cases with a small directional spreading. For these cases the diffraction is more important and there is not enough wave energy in the sheltered area nor is the wave direction well represented.
Kamphuis with Snellius (refraction) is for the case with a wide directional spreading, given the computation speed, pretty good. For the cases with a small directional spreading the wave height is not accurate.
The conclusions related to the influence of the wave processes are:
The refraction is investigated by comparing the Kamphuis module (which does not incorporate refraction) with the ground truth model. When Snell's law was applied to the kamphuis module the model results did show good results. Therefore the refraction is (especially outside the sheltered zone) very important to the wave direction.
There is a large difference for cases with small and large directional spreading. The SWAN model gives results can can be expected when no diffraction is present. Directional spreading both influences the wave height directly behind the breakwater as well as the influence lengt of the breakwater.
Diffraction does not play an important role for wind waves. The large directional spreading results in much smaller energy differences between the sheltered and the non-sheltered zone. Even SWAN without diffraction gives a good representation for wind waves. For swell waves however this is very different.Then diffraction is very important. There is a much larger difference in wave energy between the shelterd and the non-shelterd zone and for a good representation a model that can coop with diffraction is a must.
Current induced refraction of the waves has influences for waves of an incoming agle 0 to 30 degrees because this will result in rip currents along the breakwater that turn the waves up to an extra 10 to 15 degrees.
The relative sediment transport of the five modelling aproaches was also analyzed. The sediment transport proxy for the five modelling approaches showed that SWAN computes the wave height and direction well for wind waves. For swell waves however the model did not show good results. The reason is that there is no diffraction in SWAN, the diffraction computations with SWAN did not show much improvements either.
The sediment transportation proxy for the Kamphuis module with Snellius where expected to be good for wind waves, because the wave height and wave direction where well represented. However the length of the erosion pit was much smaller and also the shape of the erosion pit is very different from the other two models. ...
In coastal engineering, numerical models are used to predict the impact of coastal constructions like breakwaters. High detailed models which take for all physical processes into account will result in accurate predictions but result in large computation times. Simplified models have smaller computation times and are more suitable for coastal impact predictions on larger spatial (10 - 100 km) and temporal (decades) scale. The objective of the thesis is to improve the coastline change predictions of models at decadal scale by reviewing the common practice and a new, very fast, module for lee-side wave computations and investigating different wave processes that can improve the wave modelling. This research will focus on (1) understanding of what wave processes are important for the coastline change and (2) advise on what models to use for which conditions and how to the improve model predictions.
The approach of this thesis is triple. First five different modelling approaches for wave modelling are compared, varying in computation time and usability, to a very accurate model that will be used as ground truth. The wave conditions will vary in direction and both wind waves and swell waves will be modelled. From this step de accuracy of these models for different wave conditions can be analyzed. The second step is to get an better understanding of the processes that are involved with the wave modelling. This information can be used to improve the accuracy of model approaches with high computation times. The last step is to see how this relates to sediment transport and thus the coastline change at the lee-side of a breakwater.
This can be concluded after the investigation of 3 wave model (SWASH, SWAN and the Kamphuis module)
SWAN model approach is for cases with wind waves a good model approach: the wave height, wave direction and the sediment transport are well representative. Also the setup differences are very similar to the ground truth model.
SWAN is not very accurate for cases with a small directional spreading. For these cases the diffraction is more important and there is not enough wave energy in the sheltered area nor is the wave direction well represented.
Kamphuis with Snellius (refraction) is for the case with a wide directional spreading, given the computation speed, pretty good. For the cases with a small directional spreading the wave height is not accurate.
The conclusions related to the influence of the wave processes are:
The refraction is investigated by comparing the Kamphuis module (which does not incorporate refraction) with the ground truth model. When Snell's law was applied to the kamphuis module the model results did show good results. Therefore the refraction is (especially outside the sheltered zone) very important to the wave direction.
There is a large difference for cases with small and large directional spreading. The SWAN model gives results can can be expected when no diffraction is present. Directional spreading both influences the wave height directly behind the breakwater as well as the influence lengt of the breakwater.
Diffraction does not play an important role for wind waves. The large directional spreading results in much smaller energy differences between the sheltered and the non-sheltered zone. Even SWAN without diffraction gives a good representation for wind waves. For swell waves however this is very different.Then diffraction is very important. There is a much larger difference in wave energy between the shelterd and the non-shelterd zone and for a good representation a model that can coop with diffraction is a must.
Current induced refraction of the waves has influences for waves of an incoming agle 0 to 30 degrees because this will result in rip currents along the breakwater that turn the waves up to an extra 10 to 15 degrees.
The relative sediment transport of the five modelling aproaches was also analyzed. The sediment transport proxy for the five modelling approaches showed that SWAN computes the wave height and direction well for wind waves. For swell waves however the model did not show good results. The reason is that there is no diffraction in SWAN, the diffraction computations with SWAN did not show much improvements either.
The sediment transportation proxy for the Kamphuis module with Snellius where expected to be good for wind waves, because the wave height and wave direction where well represented. However the length of the erosion pit was much smaller and also the shape of the erosion pit is very different from the other two models.