This study explores how consent, respect, and boundaries are navigated within the Latin partner dance community in the Netherlands, focusing on salsa, bachata, and kizomba. Given the intimate and often sensual nature of these dances, understanding the management of personal and i
...
This study explores how consent, respect, and boundaries are navigated within the Latin partner dance community in the Netherlands, focusing on salsa, bachata, and kizomba. Given the intimate and often sensual nature of these dances, understanding the management of personal and interpersonal boundaries is crucial.
To address this complex issue, a dual approach combining ethnographic research with theoretical analysis was employed. The Double Diamond method structured the research through four phases: Discover, Define, Develop, and Deliver. This involved gathering data through observations and literature, refining focus areas, generating ideas, and testing solutions.
The findings reveal that boundaries in Latin partner dancing are fluid and highly context-sensitive. They shift based on individual comfort levels, dance style, and experience, making it challenging to consistently set and respect boundaries, especially in a setting characterized by frequent partner changes and minimal verbal communication.
The physical nature of partner dancing, which is predominantly non-verbal, complicates the expression and respect of boundaries. This environment can inadvertently normalize inappropriate behaviour, as open discussions about these issues are often avoided within the community.
It was found that while dancers generally recognize inappropriate behaviour as crossing personal boundaries, the reluctance to openly address these issues allows such behaviour to persist. This normalization of inappropriate behaviour is reinforced by cultural tendencies to avoid confrontation and the lack of structured mechanisms for discussing consent and boundaries.
In response to these findings, a critical design intervention was implemented to provoke reflection and discussion about boundaries and consent. By presenting thought-provoking quotes on tangible items like coins, the intervention successfully engaged participants, prompting them to reflect on their own behaviour and the broader issues within the community.
Evaluation of the intervention demonstrated its effectiveness in initiating reflection and debate. Participants engaged in meaningful discussions about their experiences and consent. However, feedback highlighted the need for less explicit language and more diverse presentation methods to improve engagement.
To advance the conversation on consent and respect, the study recommends the following:
1. Clarify prompts: Ensure that the purpose and context of prompts are clear to prevent misinterpretation and guide effective discussions.
2. Soften language: Use neutral language to make the intervention more accessible and comfortable for all participants.
3. Enhance engagement: Continue using tangible items like coins but explore additional methods to capture attention and facilitate reflection.
4. Promote long-term change: Develop ongoing initiatives to reinforce the messages about consent and respect, supporting sustained behavioural change within the community.
Overall, this study highlights the intricate dynamics of consent and boundaries within the Latin dance community. Addressing these issues through reflective and engaging interventions is crucial for fostering a more respectful and inclusive environment, ultimately enhancing the dance experience for everyone involved.