Reclaiming What Architecture Does

Toward an Ethology and Transformative Ethics of Material Arrangements

Journal Article (2018)
Author(s)

R.A. Gorny (TU Delft - Teachers of Practice, TU Delft - OLD Methods & Analysis)

Research Group
Teachers of Practice
Copyright
© 2018 R.A. Gorny
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1080/13264826.2018.1481809
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2018
Language
English
Copyright
© 2018 R.A. Gorny
Related content
Research Group
Teachers of Practice
Issue number
2
Volume number
22
Pages (from-to)
188–209
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Learning to account for material formation as 'embodied and embedded, relational and affective' figurations amounts to nothing less than an ethical project. This paper speculates on the agentic status of material arrangements to address a certain impasse yet to be overcome in the productive understanding of the built environment. In its central parts, it respectively revisits two favorite clichés of architectural theory—the Foucauldian dispositif (apparatus) and the Deleuzo-Guattarian agencement (assemblage). Therein I will reclaim their different conceptions of arrangements with the aim to outline where architectural theory could advance a radically more productive understanding of the built environment. The paper here proposes a tactical alliance with the flat, monist, and process-ontological angles of new materialist perspectives. Proposing that there is a clear project waiting for post-critical theory, the paper concludes with some consideration on how architectural theory could affirm this new theoretical agenda.