Constellation Optimization Using a Novel Coverage Analysis Method

Master Thesis (2025)
Author(s)

L.J.R. Sanders (TU Delft - Aerospace Engineering)

Contributor(s)

J Guo – Mentor (TU Delft - Space Systems Egineering)

Javier Campoy – Mentor (OHB System AG)

Faculty
Aerospace Engineering
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2025
Language
English
Graduation Date
18-09-2025
Awarding Institution
Delft University of Technology
Programme
['Aerospace Engineering']
Faculty
Aerospace Engineering
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Over the last decade, the number of Earth observation satellites in orbit have exponentially increased, many of which are flown in constellations. This development necessitates the improvement of mission analysis tools, particularly in the design of satellite constellations.
This thesis provides a new, improved coverage analysis method and applies it for research on constellation design optimization. More specifically, the new coverage analysis method is used to evaluate the revisit time and discontinuous coverage of any constellation configuration. Using a semi-analytical ground-to-spacecraft calculation, the coverage analysis method proves to be both accurate and fast.
In optimization, the coverage analysis method can be used to evaluate the candidate constellation configurations. By applying the method in a satellite constellation optimization framework, various optimization algorithms could be researched and compared. It was found that the choice of optimization algorithm is dependent on the desired result of the user, such as providing one singular optimal constellation or providing a wider range of viable configurations. The genetic algorithm and the covariance matrix adaptation evolution strategy proved to perform the best in single objective optimization, while the non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm II proved a good alternative for multi objective optimization.

Files

Master_thesis.pdf
(pdf | 5.86 Mb)
License info not available