Automated prioritised 3D dose-based MLC segment generation for step-and-shoot IMRT

Journal Article (2019)
Author(s)

B.W.K. Schipaanboord (Erasmus MC)

Sebastiaan Breedveld (Erasmus MC)

L. Rossi (Erasmus MC)

Marleen Keijzer (TU Delft - Mathematical Physics)

Ben J.M. Heijmen (Erasmus MC)

Research Group
Mathematical Physics
Copyright
© 2019 B.W.K. Schipaanboord, S. Breedveld, L. Rossi, M. Keijzer, Ben Heijmen
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/ab1df9
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2019
Language
English
Copyright
© 2019 B.W.K. Schipaanboord, S. Breedveld, L. Rossi, M. Keijzer, Ben Heijmen
Research Group
Mathematical Physics
Issue number
16
Volume number
64
Pages (from-to)
1-14
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Segmentation can degrade a high-quality dose distribution obtained by fluence map optimisation (FMO). A novel algorithm is proposed for generation of MLC segments to deliver an FMO plan with step-and-shoot IMRT while minimising quality loss. All beams are considered simultaneously while generating MLC segments for reproducing the 3D FMO dose distribution. Segment generation is only steered by the 3D FMO dose distribution, i.e. underlying FMO fluence profiles are not considered. The algorithm features prioritised generation of segments, focusing on accurate reproduction of clinical objectives with the highest priorities. The performance of the segmentation algorithm was evaluated for 20 prostate patients, 15 head-and-neck patients, and 12 liver patients. FMO dose distributions were generated by automated multi-criteria treatment planning (Pareto-optimal plans) and subsequently segmented using the proposed method. Various segmentation strategies were investigated regarding prioritisation of objectives and limitation of the number of segments. Segmented plans were dosimetrically similar to FMO plans and for all patients a clinically acceptable segmented plan could be generated. Substantial differences between FMO and segmented fluence profiles were observed. Avoidance of the usual reconstruction of 2D FMO fluence profiles for segment generation, and instead simultaneously generating segments for all beams to directly reproduce the 3D FMO dose distribution is a likely explanation for the obtained results. For the strategies of limiting the number of segments large reductions in number of segments were observed with minimal impact on plan quality.

Files

Schipaanboord_et_al._Automated... (pdf)
(pdf | 2.27 Mb)
- Embargo expired in 21-08-2020
License info not available