Optimizing CorNcrete: Enhancing structural and aesthetic performance for architectural applications

Agristone

Master Thesis (2025)
Author(s)

B. Schelvis (TU Delft - Industrial Design Engineering)

Contributor(s)

Dr. S (Sepideh) Ghodrat – Mentor (TU Delft - Emerging Materials)

S.R. Dehli – Mentor (TU Delft - Responsible Marketing and Consumer Behavior)

Faculty
Industrial Design Engineering
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2025
Language
English
Graduation Date
10-10-2025
Awarding Institution
Delft University of Technology
Programme
['Integrated Product Design']
Faculty
Industrial Design Engineering
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Concrete is the world’s second most used material after water. Its binder, cement, produces about 8% of global carbon emissions and accounts for 90% of concrete’s footprint. Reducing this impact is key to meeting the Paris Agreement’s 2030 and 2050 targets, especially in the Netherlands where low-emission housing solutions are urgently needed. Previous work on CoRncrete, a cornstarch-based concrete, demonstrated the potential of cement-free binders but was limited by poor water resistance.

This research builds on that foundation through a four-phase Material Driven Design approach. Context and material research included bench-marking, interviews, and desk study. In the tinkering phase, recipe adjustments, sealers, and surface treatments were explored, with preliminary submersion tests leading to a revised process of wet pressing and post-curing (minimizing manufacture steps), and the addition of eggshell powder as partial sand replacement. Technical characterization then tested mixes with 7.5%, 10%, and 12.5% sand replacement with eggshell powder under varied curing times, climates (5 °C/60% RH, 30 °C/60% RH, 30 °C/80% RH), and submersion conditions, using triplicate samples. Results showed a improvement in water resistance: all recipes withstood at least 24 hours of immersion compared to 10 minutes for the original mix, while the 12.5% eggshell variant achieved the highest compressive strength (14 MPa after 21 days). Experiential characterization with nine participants found a preference for eggshell-based samples, with plain, marbled, and pigmented finishes each valued for different architectural applications, as assessed with the MDD toolkit.

The final material, named Agristone, is produced as a pre-cast block (300 × 100 × 200 mm), aligning with standard concrete block dimensions for straightforward adoption in low-rise inner-leaf or partition walls. With a compressive strength of 14 MPa, Agristone falls within the range of structural lightweight concrete (11.8–21 MPa) (Ansys Granta Edupack), ensuring its technical viability. It is available in a palette of natural oxide colors, reducing finishing needs and adding design flexibility. Life cycle comparisons indicate ~45% lower CO₂ eq emissions and 60% lower embodied energy than conventional lightweight concrete. Costs of Agristone are estimated to be higher than concrete blocks (€1.55/block vs. €0.89/block), but these may be offset by the material’s sustainability, reduced construction steps, and aesthetic added value.

This work demonstrates that a cornstarch-based concrete with eggshell additive and simplified manufacture method can achieve both structural performance and moisture resistance, establishing Agristone as a promising step toward bio-based, cement-free construction materials.



Files

License info not available
License info not available
License info not available