Evaluating reanalysis datasets as meteorological input for estimating reference evapotranspiration in Africa and Southwest Asia
Bich Ngoc Tran (TU Delft - Civil Engineering & Geosciences, IHE Delft Institute for Water Education)
Suzan Dehati (IHE Delft Institute for Water Education, Wageningen University & Research)
Solomon Seyoum (IHE Delft Institute for Water Education)
Johannes van der Kwast (IHE Delft Institute for Water Education)
Graham Jewitt (IHE Delft Institute for Water Education, TU Delft - Civil Engineering & Geosciences)
Remko Uijlenhoet (TU Delft - Civil Engineering & Geosciences)
Marloes Mul (IHE Delft Institute for Water Education)
More Info
expand_more
Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.
Abstract
Recent developments of higher-resolution and lower-latency reanalysis data allow mapping reference evapotranspiration (ETo) over large areas in a near real-time manner. This study evaluates the ERA5, AgERA5 and GEOS5 reanalysis datasets for meteorological input in Africa and Southwest Asia by comparing between data products and with 174 in situ sites. The inter-comparison reveals non-stationary differences between datasets and highlights temporal inconsistencies in the GEOS5 data. When evaluated against in situ measurements, GEOS5 demonstrates lower accuracy compared with ERA5 and AgERA5. Additionally, while all datasets accurately estimate air temperature and pressure, they overestimate windspeed and solar radiation, and underestimate vapour pressure. The propagation of uncertainty estimates of ERA5 through the FAO56 ETo equation shows particularly high uncertainty in the tropics. This study emphasizes the importance of applying multiple uncertainty assessment methods for better-informed use of reanalysis data, especially in data-scarce regions.
help_outline