Identifying Subjective Perspectives on Managing Underground Risks at Schiphol Airport

Journal Article (2022)
Author(s)

Erwin Biersteker (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam)

Alfons Van Marrewijk (BI Norwegian Business School , TU Delft - Design & Construction Management, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam)

Joop Koppenjan ( Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam)

Research Group
Design & Construction Management
Copyright
© 2022 Erwin Biersteker, A.H. van Marrewijk, Joop Koppenjan
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1177/87569728221076092
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2022
Language
English
Copyright
© 2022 Erwin Biersteker, A.H. van Marrewijk, Joop Koppenjan
Research Group
Design & Construction Management
Issue number
2
Volume number
53
Pages (from-to)
181-195
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Recently, scholars have called for a focus on subjective aspects of risk management as a suitable lens for understanding how it functions. In line with this lens, this study focuses on project actors’ viewpoints on risk management in the context of construction projects to provide novel insights in risk management. Drawing on Renn's model and following a Q methodology, we identify four risk management approaches among asset managers and project managers working at the Dutch Schiphol Airport. The action-oriented and future-oriented viewpoints are dominant, while the expert input and stakeholder-centric viewpoints are in the minority. Our findings extend the risk management debate by showing that (1) there are various approaches to risk management that have been identified independently from the formal risk management; (2) these approaches cannot be explained by a project actor's role or objective within the project; and (3) that project actors have a dominant focus on managing complexity-induced risks at the expense of managing other types of risks.