Adaptive Gap-Filling of Multi-Spectral Images at Coarse and Fine Spatial Resolution

Journal Article (2025)
Author(s)

Seyedkarim Afsharipour (Chinese Academy of Sciences)

Li Jia (International Research Center of Big Data for Sustainable Development Goals, Chinese Academy of Sciences)

Massimo Menenti (TU Delft - Optical and Laser Remote Sensing, Chinese Academy of Sciences)

Hamid Reza Ghafarian Malamiri (Yazd University)

Research Group
Optical and Laser Remote Sensing
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTARS.2025.3551360
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2025
Language
English
Research Group
Optical and Laser Remote Sensing
Volume number
18
Pages (from-to)
8729-8746
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Optical fine and coarse spatial resolution multispectral images are essential for monitoring land surface processes but are often affected by gaps due to cloud contamination and other factors. Gap-filling methods are vital for overcoming these issues, yet existing approaches struggle to accurately reconstruct pixels impacted by undetected thin clouds and shadows, particularly in fine spatial resolution images. This study introduces a comprehensive gap-filling method that identifies and reconstructs invalid pixels in both fine and coarse spatial resolution images. The method combines different spatial and temporal gap-filling methods. The specific combination of methods is orchestrated to adapt to each image, mainly on the basis of the fractional abundance and spatial pattern of cloud cover. To evaluate the performance, experiments were conducted using MODIS (coarse-resolution) and Landsat/OLI (fine-resolution) images with artificial gaps (10% -90% ) introduced at varying positions in cloud-free reference images. For coarse-resolution images, the blue band showed the lowest root mean square error (RMSE) of 0.004 to 0.03, while the near-infrared (NIR) band had higher RMSE (0.01-0.05). The structural similarity index measure (SSIM) ranged from 0.96 to 0.73 as gap percentages increased. For fine-resolution images, random gaps were reconstructed most effectively, with RMSE values for the blue band between 0.005 and 0.01, and NIR errors ranging from 0.01 to 0.05. SSIM values ranged from 0.90 to 0.83 (blue) and 0.86 to 0.71 (NIR), confirming the method reliability for time-series analysis and data fusion applications.