Air–water properties of unsteady breaking bore part 2

Void fraction and bubble statistics

Journal Article (2023)
Author(s)

Rui Shi (University of Queensland)

Davide Wüthrich (TU Delft - Hydraulic Structures and Flood Risk, University of Queensland)

Hubert Chanson (University of Queensland)

Research Group
Hydraulic Structures and Flood Risk
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2022.104337
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2023
Language
English
Research Group
Hydraulic Structures and Flood Risk
Bibliographical Note
Green Open Access added to TU Delft Institutional Repository 'You share, we take care!' - Taverne project https://www.openaccess.nl/en/you-share-we-take-care Otherwise as indicated in the copyright section: the publisher is the copyright holder of this work and the author uses the Dutch legislation to make this work public.@en
Volume number
159
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Continuing from the part 1 (Shi et al., 2022) this paper presents an experimental investigation of transient void fraction and bubble statistics in a highly turbulent breaking bore with Fr1=2.4. The measurements were conducted using a combination of dual-tip phase-detection probes and an ultra-high-speed video camera. The enclosed bubble detection technique (EBDT) used the synchronised probe and camera signals to provide the contour of instantaneous void fraction in the bore roller. The ensemble-averaged void fraction was derived, and compared to analytical solutions of air diffusion models. The bubble statistics were characterised by the bubble clustering properties, pseudo bubble count rate and bubble size spectrum. The clustering data showed the non-random bubble grouping in the shear layer, and the bubble size distributions N(r) followed a commonly adopted bubble break-up model: N(r)∝r−m, where r was the equivalent bubble radius in the present study. The comparison indicated that, in the breaking bore, its air diffusion process was similar to that in a stationary hydraulic jump, and the bubble break-up process was comparable to that in breaking waves.

Files

1_s2.0_S0301932222002968_main.... (pdf)
(pdf | 5.34 Mb)
- Embargo expired in 11-06-2023
License info not available