Comparing multichannel mixed CNN-RNN to individual models for earthquake prediction

Bachelor Thesis (2022)
Author(s)

M. Houbaer (TU Delft - Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science)

Contributor(s)

Elvin Isufi – Mentor (TU Delft - Multimedia Computing)

Maosheng Yang – Mentor (TU Delft - Multimedia Computing)

Mohammad Sabbaqi – Mentor (TU Delft - Multimedia Computing)

DMJ Tax – Graduation committee member (TU Delft - Pattern Recognition and Bioinformatics)

Faculty
Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science
Copyright
© 2022 Maikel Houbaer
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2022
Language
English
Copyright
© 2022 Maikel Houbaer
Graduation Date
28-01-2022
Awarding Institution
Delft University of Technology
Project
['CSE3000 Research Project']
Programme
['Computer Science and Engineering']
Faculty
Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Earthquakes can do great harm to the environment and people's daily lives. Being able to predict an earthquake moments before it happens could therefore reduce harm and save human lives. Traditional methods have not been successful yet, but with the rise of techniques focused on deep learning, there is a growing interest to apply them to the field of earthquakes. The placement of stations measuring seismic waves at various locations across regions has also greatly contributed to the possibility of applying data-driven techniques to the problem. A neural network that has been previously successful in the prediction of epileptic seizures - is a CNN mixed with RNN methods. In this paper, we validate the use of this model in predicting earthquakes and compare its performance to individual models. We do this based on seismic measurements before the earthquakes of different stations across New Zealand. The results suggest that our method is not capable of predicting earthquakes with higher accuracy than random guessing.

Files

Final_Research_Paper.pdf
(pdf | 0.495 Mb)
License info not available