Optimising rainwater harvesting systems under uncertainty

A multi-objective stochastic approach with risk considerations

Journal Article (2025)
Author(s)

A. Shefaei (TU Delft - Water Resources)

A. Maleki (TU Delft - Sanitary Engineering)

JP van der Hoek (Waternet, TU Delft - Sanitary Engineering)

Nick van de van de Giesen (TU Delft - Water Resources)

Edo Abraham (TU Delft - Water Resources)

Research Group
Water Resources
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcradv.2025.200254
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2025
Language
English
Research Group
Water Resources
Volume number
26
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Optimising rainwater harvesting (RWH) systems’ design involves sizing the storage and catchment areas to enhance cost-effectiveness, self-sufficiency, and water quality indicators. This paper considers the design of RWH systems under long-term uncertainty in precipitation and demands. In this work, we formulate and solve a multi-objective stochastic optimisation problem that allows explicit trade-offs under uncertainty, maximising system efficiency and minimising deployment cost. We use the yield after spillage (YAS) approach to incorporate the physical and operational constraints and the big-M method to reformulate the nonlinear min\max rules of this approach as a mixed-integer linear programming (MILP) problem. By posing a risk averseness measure on efficiency as a conditional value at risk (CVaR) formulation, we guarantee the designer against the highest demand and driest weather conditions. We then exploit the lexicographic method to effectively solve the multi-objective stochastic problem as a sequence of equivalent single-objective problems. A detailed case study of a botanical garden in Amsterdam demonstrates the framework's practical application; we show significant improvements in system efficiency of up to 15.5% and 28.9% in the driest scenarios under risk-neutral and risk-averse conditions, respectively, compared to deterministic approaches. The findings highlight the importance of taking into account multiple objectives and uncertainties when designing RWH systems, allowing designers to optimise efficiency and costs based on their specific requirements without extensive parameterisation.