Linking Persistent Scatterers to the Built Environment Using Ray Tracing on Urban Models

Journal Article (2019)
Author(s)

Mengshi Yang (TU Delft - Mathematical Geodesy and Positioning, Wuhan University)

Paco Lopez Dekker (Wuhan University, TU Delft - Mathematical Geodesy and Positioning)

Prabu Dheenathayalan (TU Delft - Mathematical Geodesy and Positioning)

Filip Biljecki (National University of Singapore)

Mingsheng Liao (Wuhan University)

Ramon Hanssen (TU Delft - Mathematical Geodesy and Positioning)

Research Group
Mathematical Geodesy and Positioning
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2019.2901904
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2019
Language
English
Research Group
Mathematical Geodesy and Positioning
Issue number
8
Volume number
57
Pages (from-to)
5764 - 5776
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Persistent scatterers (PSs) are coherent measurement points obtained from time series of satellite radar images, which are used to detect and estimate millimeter-scale displacements of the terrain or man-made structures. However, associating these measurement points with specific physical objects is not straightforward, which hampers the exploitation of the full potential of the data. We have investigated the potential for predicting the occurrence and location of PSs using generic 3-D city models and ray-tracing methods, and proposed a methodology to match PSs to the pointlike scatterers predicted using RaySAR, a ray-tracing synthetic aperture radar simulator. We also investigate the impact of the level of detail (LOD) of the city models. For our test area in Rotterdam, we find that 10% and 37% of the PSs detected in a stack of TerraSAR-X data can be matched with point scatterers identified by ray tracing using LOD1 and LOD2 models, respectively. In the LOD1 case, most matched scatterers are at street level while LOD2 allows the identification of many scatterers on the buildings. Over half of the identified scatterers easily correspond to identify double or triple-bounce scatterers. However, a significant fraction corresponds to higher bounce levels, with approximately 25% being fivefold-bounce scatterers.

Files

TGRS29019042.pdf
(pdf | 7.12 Mb)
License info not available