Usefulness and satisfaction of take-over requests for highly automated driving

Conference Paper (2017)
Author(s)

P. Bazilinskyy (TU Delft - Intelligent Vehicles, TU Delft - Biomechatronics & Human-Machine Control)

A. Eriksson (University of Southampton)

Sebastiaan Petermeijer (Technische Universität München)

J. C.F. Winter (TU Delft - Biomechatronics & Human-Machine Control, TU Delft - Human-Robot Interaction)

Research Group
Biomechatronics & Human-Machine Control
Copyright
© 2017 P. Bazilinskyy, A. Eriksson, S.M. Petermeijer, J.C.F. de Winter
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2017
Language
English
Copyright
© 2017 P. Bazilinskyy, A. Eriksson, S.M. Petermeijer, J.C.F. de Winter
Research Group
Biomechatronics & Human-Machine Control
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

This paper summarizes our results from survey research and driving simulator experiments on auditory, vibrotactile, and visual take-over requests in highly automated driving. Our review shows that vibrotactile takeover requests in the driver’s seat yielded relatively high ratings of self-reported usefulness and satisfaction. Auditory take-over requests in the form of beeping sound were regarded as useful but not satisfactory, and it was found that the beep rate corresponds to perceived urgency. Visual-only feedback (LEDs) was regarded by participants as neither useful nor satisfactory. Augmented visual feedback was found to support effective steering and braking actions, and may be a useful compliment to vibrotactile take-over requests. The present findings may be used in the design of take-over requests.

Files

Bazilinskyy_2017_paper.pdf
(pdf | 1.29 Mb)
License info not available