A cross-cultural perspective on risky young drivers’ behavior
evidence from 12 countries
Sergio A. Useche (Universidad de Valencia (ICMol))
Bridie Scott-Parker (USC – University of the Sunshine Coast)
Francisco Alonso (Universidad de Valencia (ICMol))
Boris Cendales (Universidad El Bosque)
Sergio Traficante (Università degli Studi di Bari Aldo Moro)
Jeremias Tosi (Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET))
Ruben Ledesma (Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET))
Teodora Stefanova (University of Sheffield)
Oscar Oviedo-Trespalacios (TU Delft - Technology, Policy and Management)
undefined More Authors
More Info
expand_more
Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.
Abstract
Young drivers represent a high-risk group worldwide, with their overrepresentation in road trauma placing substantial pressure on health and economic systems. Their crashes are often linked to risky driving behaviors, accentuating the need for reliable instruments to assess these patterns. The Behavior of Young Novice Drivers Scale (BYNDS) was developed to comprehensively assess multiple dimensions of risky driving behavior in drivers aged 17–29 years; however, it has not yet undergone cross-cultural validation. Aim This study aimed to conduct a comprehensive cross-cultural validation of the BYNDS and examine differences in risky driving behaviors among young drivers from Low- and Middle-Income (LMIC) and High-Income (HIC) countries. Method Data were collected from a cross-sectional sample of n = 3,989 young drivers aged M = 22.25 years, of whom 52 % were male and 48 % female. Participants completed the BYNDS, a 44-item behavioral questionnaire administered across 12 countries (48.6 % LMICs; 51.4 % HICs) spanning five continents. Results The findings indicate that the BYNDS supports a five-factor structure with good fit indices, strong factor loadings, and acceptable reliability, and invariance between countries of different income levels. Furthermore, the validated BYNDS-42 (comprising 42 items distributed across five factors) also showed the ability to distinguish between drivers with and without self-reported crashes or traffic fines. Conclusion This study provides robust evidence supporting the cross-cultural validity and reliability of the BYNDS, reinforcing its value as a tool for assessing young driver behavior. These findings offer empirically grounded insights that can inform behavioral interventions aimed at improving young drivers’ road safety.
help_outline