Machine learning for humanitarian forecasting: A Survey

Assessing the trustworthiness and real-world feasibility of machine learning models for conflict forecasting

Bachelor Thesis (2025)
Author(s)

A. Gavrilă (TU Delft - Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science)

Contributor(s)

Marijn Roelvink – Mentor (TU Delft - Multimedia Computing)

Cynthia CS Liem – Mentor (TU Delft - Multimedia Computing)

J. Sun – Graduation committee member (TU Delft - Pattern Recognition and Bioinformatics)

Faculty
Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2025
Language
English
Graduation Date
25-06-2025
Awarding Institution
Delft University of Technology
Project
['CSE3000 Research Project']
Programme
['Computer Science and Engineering']
Faculty
Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

As humanitarian needs increase while donor budgets decrease, anticipatory strategies are essential for effective crisis response. In this context, machine learning (ML) has emerged as a promising tool for crisis forecasting, offering the potential to support timely interventions and humanitarian decision-making. However, despite rapid developments in ML-based prediction models, questions remain about their practical utility and trustworthiness in real-world humanitarian settings. This study presents a systematic scoping review of 32 academic and gray literature sources to assess the reliability and feasibility of ML systems for conflict forecasting. By analyzing these systems across dimensions such as forecasting scope, data sources, modeling approaches, validation practices, and ethical considerations, the study finds that while some models demonstrate strong predictive performance and methodological rigor, many lack transparent validation, robust error analysis, and operational applicability. The review concludes that while ML systems hold substantial potential for enhancing conflict anticipation, their current real-world readiness is uneven and context-dependent.

Files

License info not available