The Potential of Demand-Responsive Transport as a Complement to Public Transport

An Assessment Framework and an Empirical Evaluation

Journal Article (2018)
Author(s)

M.J. Alonso González (TU Delft - Transport and Planning)

T. L.K. Liu (TU Delft - Transport and Planning)

O. Cats (TU Delft - Transport and Planning)

N Oort (TU Delft - Transport and Planning)

S. Hoogendoorn (TU Delft - Transport and Planning)

Transport and Planning
Copyright
© 2018 M.J. Alonso González, T.L.K. Liu, O. Cats, N. van Oort, S.P. Hoogendoorn
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198118790842
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2018
Language
English
Copyright
© 2018 M.J. Alonso González, T.L.K. Liu, O. Cats, N. van Oort, S.P. Hoogendoorn
Transport and Planning
Issue number
8
Volume number
2672
Pages (from-to)
879-889
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Demand-responsive transport (DRT) services (collective on-demand services, such as shared ridesourcing and microtransit) offer a collective flexible travel alternative that can potentially complement fixed transit (FT). The combination of an on-demand and line-based service holds the promise of improved mobility and increased service coverage. However, to date, it remains unknown whether DRT services deliver these much anticipated improvements. This study presents an assessment framework to evaluate the performance of DRT and related changes in accessibility, and performs an empirical analysis for a recently introduced DRT service in the Netherlands. The framework includes a performance benchmark between DRT and FT based on the computation of generalized journey times of the DRT rides and the FT alternatives, and can help identify whether DRT is used as a complement or a substitute for FT. The framework covers the spatial and temporal dimensions, and the explicit consideration of rejected trips is an integral part of the evaluation. Results suggest large accessibility improvements for DRT users, especially for some underserved origin–destination pairs.