Risk-Aware Contracting Strategies for Electrolytic Hydrogen Projects Facing Grid Congestion
T. Swarts (Eindhoven University of Technology)
W. van Den Akker (Eindhoven University of Technology)
J. Morren (Eindhoven University of Technology)
A. van Voorden (TU Delft - Electrical Sustainable Energy)
H. Slootweg (Eindhoven University of Technology)
More Info
expand_more
Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.
Abstract
Electrolytic hydrogen is expected to play a key role in decarbonizing energy systems in Europe. However, such projects face uncertain grid access due to congestion and struggle with financial viability. To address growing grid congestion in the Netherlands, different types of non-firm connection and transport agreements (CTAs) and capacity restriction contracts (CRCs) were introduced, enabling client curtailment in exchange for tariff discounts or per-MW compensation. This paper investigates investment and contracting decisions for electrolyzer projects under these novel contracts using a two-stage risk-aware stochastic optimization model that captures uncertainty in electricity prices and grid access. Results show that risk-averse clients prefer non-firm CTA-85 contracts, which balance tariff discounts with curtailment compensation, while risk-neutral clients favor standard non-firm CTAs. The new contract types can lower the break-even hydrogen price by approximately €0.50/kg compared to firm contracts outside congested areas, and thus improve the business case for electrolytic hydrogen in the Netherlands.
Files
File under embargo until 30-06-2026