Deterministic vs. robust design optimization using DEM-based metamodels
M.P. Fransen (TU Delft - Transport Engineering and Logistics)
M. Langelaar (TU Delft - Computational Design and Mechanics)
Dingena Schott (TU Delft - Transport Engineering and Logistics)
More Info
expand_more
Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.
Abstract
In design optimization of bulk handling equipment (BHE) we generally focus on the mean performance of the equipment. However, granular materials behave stochastic due to irregularities in particle shape and size which leads to stochastic performance of the equipment. To include the stochastic performance we propose robust metamodel-based design optimization (MBDO). The used metamodels are trained with stochastic performance data from randomly repeated discrete element method (DEM) simulations and predict mean and variance of the equipment performance. This method is compared to the conventional deterministic optimization method by means of a case study of a discharging hopper including verification and validation. The robust MBDO shows more distinctive optimal designs compared to the deterministic approach. In addition, the DEM-based metamodel is a relatively accurate method to predict DEM-model simulation results. However, the validation indicates that differences between DEM-model and experimental results highly affect the reliability of the found optima.
help_outline