Migration and clinical outcome of mobile-bearing versus fixed-bearing single-radius total knee arthroplasty

A randomized controlled trial

Journal Article (2018)
Author(s)

K. T. Van Hamersveld (Leiden University Medical Center)

Perla Jacqueline Marang-van de Mheen (Leiden University Medical Center)

Huub J.L. Van Der Heide (Leiden University Medical Center)

Henrica M.J. Van Der Linden-Van Der Zwaag (Leiden University Medical Center)

E.R. Valstar (Leiden University Medical Center)

Rob G.H.H. Nelissen (Leiden University Medical Center)

Research Group
Biomechatronics & Human-Machine Control
Copyright
© 2018 Koen T. Van Hamersveld, P.J. Marang-van de Mheen, Huub J.L. Van Der Heide, Henrica M.J. Van Der Linden-Van Der Zwaag, E.R. Valstar, R.G.H.H. Nelissen
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1080/17453674.2018.1429108
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2018
Language
English
Copyright
© 2018 Koen T. Van Hamersveld, P.J. Marang-van de Mheen, Huub J.L. Van Der Heide, Henrica M.J. Van Der Linden-Van Der Zwaag, E.R. Valstar, R.G.H.H. Nelissen
Research Group
Biomechatronics & Human-Machine Control
Issue number
2
Volume number
89
Pages (from-to)
190-196
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Background and purpose — Mobile-bearing total knee prostheses (TKPs) were developed in the 1970s in an attempt to increase function and improve implant longevity. However, modern fixed-bearing designs like the single-radius TKP may provide similar advantages. We compared tibial component migration measured with radiostereometric analysis (RSA) and clinical outcome of otherwise similarly designed cemented fixed-bearing and mobile-bearing single-radius TKPs. Patients and methods — RSA measurements and clinical scores were assessed in 46 randomized patients at baseline, 6 months, 1 year, and annually thereafter up to 6 years postoperatively. A linear mixed-effects model was used to analyze the repeated measurements. Results — Both groups showed comparable migration (p = 0.3), with a mean migration at 6-year follow-up of 0.90 mm (95% CI 0.49–1.41) for the fixed-bearing group compared with 1.22 mm (95% CI 0.75–1.80) for the mobile-bearing group. Clinical outcomes were similar between groups. 1 fixed-bearing knee was revised for aseptic loosening after 6 years and 2 knees (1 in each group) were revised for late infection. 2 knees (1 in each group) were suspected for loosening due to excessive migration. Another mobile-bearing knee was revised after an insert dislocation due to failure of the locking mechanism 6 weeks postoperatively, after which study inclusion was preliminary terminated. Interpretation — Fixed-bearing and mobile-bearing single-radius TKPs showed similar migration. The latter may, however, expose patients to more complex surgical techniques and risks such as insert dislocations inherent to this rotating-platform design.