Kuy-e Narmak (1952–1958)

The growth and change of an urban community in Tehran

Journal Article (2019)
Author(s)

S.M.A. Sedighi (TU Delft - Public Building and Housing Design, TU Delft - Teachers of Practice / A)

N.J. Amorim Mota (TU Delft - Public Building and Housing Design)

Research Group
Public Building and Housing Design
Copyright
© 2019 S.M.A. Sedighi, Nelson Mota
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1080/02665433.2019.1598280
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2019
Language
English
Copyright
© 2019 S.M.A. Sedighi, Nelson Mota
Research Group
Public Building and Housing Design
Issue number
3
Volume number
35 (2020)
Pages (from-to)
477-504
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

This article examines the growth and change through time of Kuy-e Narmak, a housing neighbourhood developed in the 1950s under the auspices of Mosaddeq’s Modernization Program. The project was designed by a group of young-leading European-educated Iranian architects that collaborated with the government to develop affordable housing solutions in Iran. To design this project, these architects advanced solutions that explored a cross-pollination between the principles of the functional city, and references from vernacular architecture. Over the last 6 decades, the number of households living in Narmak increased dramatically, from the initial goal of accommodating 7500 families, to the 90,000 families that currently live there. This article discusses the extent to which the initial design decisions were instrumental to cope with this extraordinary increase in the district’s density. We have used typological and morphological analysis, combined with site surveys and interviews to investigate the district’s growth and change through time. This article argues that the designer’s critical combination of modernist planning concepts with elements borrowed from Iran’s vernacular tradition resulted in a socially inclusive urban community. The plan’s rigid urban form has become instrumental in defining a neutral background to accommodate the ever-changing social and spatial practices of its inhabitants.