A UAV–3DGS–VR Workflow for Scenario-Comparable Immersive Review in Heritage Landscapes

Journal Article (2026)
Author(s)

Xintong Li (Xi'an University of Architecture and Technology)

Wenqi Sheng (Rhode Island School of Design)

Yixuan Tang (Xi'an University of Architecture and Technology)

Yingwen Yu (TU Delft - Architecture and the Built Environment)

Yuyang Peng (TU Delft - Architecture and the Built Environment)

Research Group
Digital Technologies
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.3390/drones10060404 Final published version
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2026
Language
English
Research Group
Digital Technologies
Journal title
Drones
Issue number
6
Volume number
10
Article number
404
Downloads counter
4
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) are widely used for documentation, surveying, and 3D modeling in the built environment, yet their outputs often remain difficult to reuse for immersive comparison of alternative construction scenarios. This study presents a low-cost UAV-to-3DGS-to-VR workflow for constructing scenario-comparable immersive environments for built-environment review. The workflow combines multi-angle UAV imagery, point-cloud-based geometric anchoring, 3D Gaussian Splatting (3DGS), and Unity-based virtual reality (VR) to transform drone-captured reality into a reusable scene for controlled scenario comparison. The workflow is demonstrated in Middenbeemster, the central town of the Beemster polder World Heritage property. One present-condition scene (M0) and three alternative construction scenarios (M1 to M3) were created within a shared spatial reference. Reconstruction quality was assessed using PSNR and SSIM, and the VR scenes were further evaluated through eye-tracking, head-motion recording, and subjective ranking. The results indicate that the workflow can generate visually reliable and directly comparable immersive scenes from UAV data in this case study. Behavioral and subjective findings showed a consistent pattern, with M1 appearing more compatible than M2 and M3 in this pilot evaluation. The study contributes a pilot UAV-based workflow that links reality capture, immersive scenario comparison, and supplementary behavioral evidence within one process.