Heritage landscapes are experienced, interpreted, and governed through what people see. Visual qualities such as skyline continuity, landmark prominence, enclosure, openness, and view accessibility influence how heritage value is perceived and how spatial interventions are accept
...
Heritage landscapes are experienced, interpreted, and governed through what people see. Visual qualities such as skyline continuity, landmark prominence, enclosure, openness, and view accessibility influence how heritage value is perceived and how spatial interventions are accepted. Meanwhile, urbanization, tourism development, and infrastructure expansion increasingly reshape visual environments, making visual governance a central concern in heritage conservation and landscape planning. Although visual heritage landscape research has grown rapidly, it often remains fragmented: studies tend to privilege either spatial-technical modelling or perception-based evaluation, and the connections between data, methods, and research aims are frequently implicit. This fragmentation limits cross-case comparability, weakens methodological accumulation, and reduces the usability of research outputs for practice. Therefore, the main objective of this thesis is to establish a pathway-oriented framework that links data-method-content configurations, enabling visual evidence to be translated into structured knowledge and practical guidance for spatial decision-making.
A pathway-oriented framework for visual heritage landscape research
This thesis conceptualizes visual heritage landscape research as a set of pathways that integrate three core components: the data used to describe visual environments, the methods used to analyze them, and the content outcomes expected for interpretation and decision support. Instead of treating methods as isolated techniques, the framework emphasizes how different components can be assembled in coherent sequences to match research purposes, spatial scales, and heritage contexts. Based on this logic, four expanded pathway types (EP-1 to EP-4) are proposed to bridge commonly separated approaches and to support more systematic, integrative study designs. Each pathway highlights a distinct integration focus, but collectively they provide a transferable structure for organizing visual research questions, selecting appropriate evidence, and producing outputs that are both analytically rigorous and implementation-oriented.
Pathway implementation through four case studies
The framework is implemented through four case studies that test the expanded pathways across diverse heritage landscape contexts and multi-scale conditions. EP-1 demonstrates an integrated spatial-perceptual pathway that connects spatial structure with perceptual evidence, enabling the interpretation of visual mechanisms and the validation of experienced visual qualities. EP-2 develops a digitally supported perception evaluation pathway that extends visual assessment to larger spatial coverage and multiple viewpoints through digital capture and modelling, providing scalable insight into visual quality and environmental preference. EP-3 proposes a multi-source visual-spatial pathway that integrates heterogeneous geo-data and multi-view analyses to strengthen interpretation across viewpoints and spatial levels, supporting a richer understanding of how visual patterns emerge from landscape structure. EP-4 advances a perception-informed decision pathway that couples perceptual evidence with visibility modelling to generate threshold-style rules and decision-ready outputs for visual impact assessment, planning control, and governance. Across cases, the thesis produces reusable indicators, spatial typologies, and pattern-based knowledge that can inform conservation strategies, design interventions, and management priorities.
Synthesis, navigation, and contributions
Building on cross-case synthesis, the thesis develops a navigational model that supports pathway selection and configuration according to objectives, constraints, data availability, and implementation needs. This model encourages modular entry points, allowing studies to begin from data constraints, methodological strengths, or governance questions, while still remaining comparable within a shared pathway system. Overall, the thesis contributes by structuring a fragmented field into a coherent framework of pathways, offering modular workflows that connect data acquisition-computation-assessment, and translating visual heritage landscape research into evidence-informed, interpretable, and actionable tools. These contributions aim to strengthen the integration of visual evidence into heritage landscape conservation, planning, and design, and to support more transparent and robust decision-making in visually sensitive heritage contexts.