Experimental investigation on the effect of the duct geometrical parameters on the performance of a ducted wind turbine

Journal Article (2018)
Author(s)

Juan Tang (TU Delft - Wind Energy)

F. Avallone (TU Delft - Wind Energy)

R. Bontempo (Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II)

GJW van Bussel (TU Delft - Wind Energy)

M. Manna (Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II)

Research Group
Wind Energy
Copyright
© 2018 J. Tang, F. Avallone, R. Bontempo, G.J.W. van Bussel, M. Manna
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1037/2/022034
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2018
Language
English
Copyright
© 2018 J. Tang, F. Avallone, R. Bontempo, G.J.W. van Bussel, M. Manna
Research Group
Wind Energy
Issue number
2
Volume number
1037
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

This paper reports an experimental investigation on the effect of the duct geometry on the aerodynamic performance of an aerofoil shaped ducted wind turbine (DWT). The tested two-dimensional model is composed of an aerofoil equipped with pressure taps and a uniform porous screen. The experimental setup is based on the assumption that the duct flow is axisymmetric and the rotor can be simulated as an actuator disc. Firstly, different tip clearances between the screen and the aerofoil are tested to point out the influence of this parameter on the DWT performance in terms of aerofoil pressure distribution, aerofoil lift and flow field features at the duct exit area. Then, the combined effect of tip clearance, of the angle of attack and of the screen position along the aerofoil chord is evaluated through a Design of Experiments (DoE) based approach. The analysis shows that, among the analysed range of design factor variation, increasing angle of attack and the tip clearance leads to a beneficial effect on the lift and back-pressure coefficients, while they show a poor dependence upon the screen axial position. Finally, the configuration characterized by the maximum value of all three main factors (15 degree of angle of attack, 5% of tip clearance and 30% backward to the nozzle plane), has the best values of lift coefficient and back-pressure coefficient.