Comparing in silico flowsheet optimization strategies in biopharmaceutical downstream processes
Daphne Keulen (TU Delft - BT/Bioprocess Engineering)
Myrto Apostolidi (Student TU Delft)
Geoffroy Geldhof (GlaxoSmithKline)
Olivier Le Le Bussy (GlaxoSmithKline)
M. Pabst (TU Delft - BT/Environmental Biotechnology)
M. Ottens (TU Delft - BT/Design and Engineering Education)
More Info
expand_more
Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.
Abstract
The challenging task of designing biopharmaceutical downstream processes is initially to select the type of unit operations, followed by optimizing their operating conditions. For complex flowsheet optimizations, the strategy becomes crucial in terms of duration and outcome. In this study, we compared three optimization strategies, namely, simultaneous, top-to-bottom, and superstructure decomposition. Moreover, all strategies were evaluated by either using chromatographic Mechanistic Models (MMs) or Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs). An overall evaluation of 39 flowsheets was performed, including a buffer-exchange step between the chromatography operations. All strategies identified orthogonal structures to be optimal, and the weighted overall performance values were generally consistent between the MMs and ANNs. In terms of time-efficiency, the decomposition method with MMs stands out when utilizing multiple cores on a multiprocessing system for simulations. This study analyses the influence of different optimization strategies on flowsheet optimization and advices on suitable strategies and modeling techniques for specific scenarios.
help_outline