Predicting the benefit of wake steering on the annual energy production of a wind farm using large eddy simulations and Gaussian process regression

Journal Article (2020)
Author(s)

D.C. Van Der Hoek (TU Delft - Team Jan-Willem van Wingerden)

Bart M. Doekemeijer (TU Delft - Team Jan-Willem van Wingerden)

Erik Andersson (Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU))

Jan Willem Van Wingerden (TU Delft - Team Jan-Willem van Wingerden)

Research Group
Team Jan-Willem van Wingerden
Copyright
© 2020 D.C. van der Hoek, B.M. Doekemeijer, Leif Erik Andersson, J.W. van Wingerden
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1618/2/022024
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2020
Language
English
Copyright
© 2020 D.C. van der Hoek, B.M. Doekemeijer, Leif Erik Andersson, J.W. van Wingerden
Research Group
Team Jan-Willem van Wingerden
Issue number
2
Volume number
1618
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

In recent years, wake steering has been established as a promising method to increase the energy yield of a wind farm. Current practice in estimating the benefit of wake steering on the annual energy production (AEP) consists of evaluating the wind farm with simplified surrogate models, casting a large uncertainty on the estimated benefit. This paper presents a framework for determining the benefit of wake steering on the AEP, incorporating simulation results from a surrogate model and large eddy simulations in order to reduce the uncertainty. Furthermore, a time-varying wind direction is considered for a better representation of the ambient conditions at the real wind farm site. Gaussian process regression is used to combine the two data sets into a single improved model of the energy gain. This model estimates a 0.60% gain in AEP for the considered wind farm, which is a 76% increase compared to the estimate of the surrogate model.