Monitoring multiple aspects of learning when design-based learning meets science education

Journal Article (2026)
Author(s)

Hanna Stammes (Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen)

Ineke Henze

Erik Barendsen (Open University of the Netherlands)

Marc de Vries (TU Delft - Applied Sciences)

Research Group
Groep Science & Engineering Education
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-025-10009-y Final published version
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2026
Language
English
Research Group
Groep Science & Engineering Education
Journal title
International Journal of Technology and Design Education
Issue number
2
Volume number
36
Pages (from-to)
641-661
Downloads counter
10
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Curricular reforms are increasingly positioning design-based learning as an integral part of secondary school science education. This growing emphasis is posing challenges for science teachers. One such challenge concerns the formative assessment of student learning in a context known for its wide range of potential learning goals. This study sought to explore this underexamined area by investigating an experienced chemistry teacher’s formative assessment reasoning. We were specifically interested in the breadth of aspects of learning that a science teacher may focus on in a design context. We collected data during weekly reflection conversations with the teacher, conducted over the course of her implementation of a design project for 10th-grade chemistry education. Qualitative data analysis showed that the teacher monitored diverse aspects of learning, namely students’ chemical thinking, design practices, research practices, social interactions, ownership, behaviour and emotions. The case furthermore showed how the teacher connected different aspects of learning which could support her interpretation of student learning, but also demonstrated tensions between desired learning outcomes. The findings offer suggestions for future development of design-based learning frameworks, and for teacher educators who seek to support teachers’ formative assessment in contexts where design and science meet.