Public transport fare elasticities from smartcard data

Evidence from a natural experiment

Journal Article (2021)
Author(s)

Yaroslav Kholodov (Student TU Delft)

Erik Jenelius (KTH Royal Institute of Technology)

Oded Cats (TU Delft - Transport and Planning)

Niels Oort (TU Delft - Transport and Planning)

N Mouter (TU Delft - Transport and Logistics)

Matej Cebecauer (KTH Royal Institute of Technology)

Alex Vermeulen (TU Delft - Transport and Planning)

Transport and Planning
Copyright
© 2021 Yaroslav Kholodov, Erik Jenelius, O. Cats, N. van Oort, N. Mouter, Matej Cebecauer, A.A.J. Vermeulen
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2021.03.001
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2021
Language
English
Copyright
© 2021 Yaroslav Kholodov, Erik Jenelius, O. Cats, N. van Oort, N. Mouter, Matej Cebecauer, A.A.J. Vermeulen
Transport and Planning
Volume number
105
Pages (from-to)
35-43
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

This paper develops a method for analysing the elasticity of travel demand to public transport fares. The methodology utilizes public transport smartcard data for collecting disaggregate full population data about passengers’ travel behaviour. The study extends previous work by deriving specific fare elasticities for distinct socioeconomic (e.g., car ownership and income) groups and public transport modes (metro, trains and buses), and by considering the directionality of the fare change. The case study involves a public transport fare policy introduced by the regional administration of Stockholm County in January 2017, where the zonal fare system for single-trip tickets was replaced by a flat-fare policy. The overall fare elasticity of travel funds is found to be −0.46. User sensitivity grows along with the journey distance. Metro users demonstrate the lowest sensitivity, followed by bus and commuter train riders. Low socioeconomic groups, in particular with respect to car ownership, tend to be less sensitive than the high-factor groups. In addition to the direct effect of changed fares, simplification and unification of the fare scheme appears to have substantially contributed to its attractiveness. The flat fare may allow the geographic disparity of public transport travel to be reduced and new users to be attracted from remote areas who are more prone to own cars.