Privacy Risks in Event-Based Cameras: The Role of Sensor Configuration

How Different Sensor Configurations Affect Face Identification

Bachelor Thesis (2026)
Author(s)

S.A. Ali (TU Delft - Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science)

Contributor(s)

N. Tömen – Mentor (TU Delft - Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science)

T. Parlayici – Mentor (TU Delft - Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science)

R. Guerra Marroquim – Graduation committee member (TU Delft - Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science)

Faculty
Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2026
Language
English
Graduation Date
26-06-2026
Awarding Institution
Delft University of Technology
Project
CSE3000 Research Project
Programme
Computer Science and Engineering
Faculty
Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science
Downloads counter
15
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Event-based cameras—sensors that asynchronously record pixel-level brightness changes rather than full image frames—are often assumed to be privacy-preserving due to their sparse visual output. This thesis investigates how physical sensor configurations, including temporal bandwidth, contrast thresholds, leak noise, and spatial resolution, affect the trade-off between data utility and biometric privacy risk. We introduce a cross-domain evaluation framework that measures identity leakage using reconstructed event streams and a frozen pre-trained face recognition model. Our results show that event streams retain sufficient facial structure for accurate identification. We further identify a privacy paradox in which reducing temporal bandwidth increases attacker performance by denoising the signal, while background leak noise effectively disrupts reconstruction and lowers identification accuracy. Privacy effectiveness also varies substantially with subject motion, and the apparent benefits of resolution scaling are largely explained by domain mismatch. Overall, the findings suggest that static sensor configurations cannot guarantee anonymity, highlighting the need for threat-aware sensor design and adaptive privacy safeguards. The code used in this research is available at: [https://github.com/Stunner070/research-project-bsc-cse-tudelft](https://github.com/Stunner070/research-project-bsc-cse-tudelft).

Files

License info not available