Calibration techniques for single-sensor ultrasound imaging with a coding mask

Conference Paper (2019)
Author(s)

Pim Meulen (TU Delft - Signal Processing Systems)

Pieter Kruizinga (Erasmus MC)

Johannes Bosch (Erasmus MC)

G Leus (TU Delft - Signal Processing Systems)

Research Group
Signal Processing Systems
Copyright
© 2019 P.Q. van der Meulen, P. Kruizinga, Johannes G. Bosch, G.J.T. Leus
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1109/ACSSC.2018.8645085
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2019
Language
English
Copyright
© 2019 P.Q. van der Meulen, P. Kruizinga, Johannes G. Bosch, G.J.T. Leus
Research Group
Signal Processing Systems
Bibliographical Note
Green Open Access added to TU Delft Institutional Repository ‘You share, we take care!’ – Taverne project https://www.openaccess.nl/en/you-share-we-take-care Otherwise as indicated in the copyright section: the publisher is the copyright holder of this work and the author uses the Dutch legislation to make this work public.@en
Pages (from-to)
1641-1645
ISBN (print)
978-1-5386-9219-6
ISBN (electronic)
978-1-5386-9218-9
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

We consider a model-based ultrasound imaging scenario using a single transducer with a coding mask, and assume that the pulse-echo model is erroneously estimated, resulting in decreased imaging performance. Although the pulse-echo Green's function to each pixel has to be measured to obtain a good model, typically only forward-field measurements are obtained for better SNR, from which the pulse-echo Green's functions are estimated. However, if the transducer's receive transfer function is different from the transmit transfer function, the forward-field measurements do not incorporate the receive transfer function, resulting in an incorrect pulse-echo model. We propose two calibration techniques that start with this erroneous model, and update it using pulse-echo measurements. In the first technique we assume the calibration phantom is known a priori, whereas in the second technique we use multiple random calibration phantoms of which only the second-order statistics are assumed to be known beforehand. Both methods are able to significantly improve the pulse-echo model, strongly improving imaging performance. Our simulation results show that the first technique works best, since there is no uncertainty about the calibration image, whereas the blind calibration technique requires no exact knowledge of the calibration phantom, making it robust to positioning or manufacturing errors.

Files

Calibration_techniques_for_sin... (pdf)
(pdf | 0.252 Mb)
- Embargo expired in 21-08-2019
License info not available