Spatial homogeneity and heterogeneity of energy poverty

a neglected dimension

Journal Article (2018)
Author(s)

B Mashhoodi (TU Delft - Environmental Technology and Design, TU Delft - OLD Urban Compositions)

Dominic Stead (TU Delft - Spatial Planning and Strategy)

Arjan V. van Timmeren (TU Delft - Environmental Technology and Design, Amsterdam Institute for Advanced Metropolitan Solutions (AMS))

Research Group
Environmental Technology and Design
Copyright
© 2018 B. Mashhoodi, D. Stead, A. van Timmeren
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1080/19475683.2018.1557253
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2018
Language
English
Copyright
© 2018 B. Mashhoodi, D. Stead, A. van Timmeren
Research Group
Environmental Technology and Design
Issue number
1
Volume number
25 (2019)
Pages (from-to)
19-31
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Since the 1970s, a variety of studies has searched for the sociodemographic, housing and economic determinants of energy poverty. A central question, however, has not been answered by any of the previous studies: what are the national-level determinants, i.e. the determinants that homogeneously provoke a high level of energy poverty in all areas of a country? What are the neighbourhood-specific determinants, i.e. the characteristics that have a heterogeneous impact across the neighbourhoods of a country? This study seeks to answer these questions by analysing the level of energy poverty, the percentage of households’ disposable income spent on energy expenditure, in 2473 neighbourhoods of the Netherlands in 2014. By employing a semi-parametric geographically weighted regression analysis, the effects of two of the determinants of energy poverty are found to be spatially homogeneous: (i) percentage of low-income households and (ii) percentage of pensioners. The results indicate that the impacts of six of the determinants are spatially heterogeneous: (i) household size, (ii) percentage of unemployment, (iii) building age, (iv) percentage of privately rented dwellings, (v) number of summer days and (vi) number of frost days. Subsequently, the effects of spatially homogeneous and heterogeneous determinants are estimated and mapped; the results are discussed and some policy implications are proposed.