Robust prognostics of impacted composite structures using an adaptive hidden semi-Markov model

Journal Article (2025)
Author(s)

Mariana Salinas-Camus (TU Delft - Group Eleftheroglou)

George Galanopoulos (TU Delft - Group Zarouchas)

Lucas Amaral (TU Delft - Structural Integrity & Composites, TU Delft - Safety and Security)

Ethan I.L. Jull (TNO)

Nick Eleftheroglou (TU Delft - Group Eleftheroglou)

Research Group
Group Eleftheroglou
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1177/14759217251368254
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2025
Language
English
Research Group
Group Eleftheroglou
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Prognostics and health management (PHM) is becoming increasingly important as engineering structures and systems grow more complex. Many of these systems lack accurate physical models to describe their degradation, especially in unpredictable scenarios. To meet safety regulations, robust prognostic models are needed to transform sensor data into reliable predictions about a system’s remaining useful life (RUL). This study presents the adaptive hidden semi-Markov model (AHSMM), a novel probabilistic approach that enhances RUL prediction accuracy, uncertainty quantification (UQ), and reliability assessment compared to a long short-term memory (LSTM) model. A key contribution is an in-house experimental campaign involving glass fiber-reinforced polymer specimens subjected to fatigue loading and multiple impact events at different locations and time intervals. Unlike traditional models that rely on data from similar damage histories, the AHSMM is trained exclusively on unimpacted specimens and tested on multiply impacted ones, showcasing its adaptability to previously unseen conditions. The study also introduces a new prognostic performance measure tailored to AHSMM and develops a conditional reliability analysis for both AHSMM and LSTM predictions. Results demonstrate that AHSMM consistently outperforms LSTM across all evaluation metrics. It achieves a 24% lower RMSE over the full lifetime and superior UQ, with an average coverage of 0.79 compared to 0.17 for LSTM. Conditional reliability analysis further shows that AHSMM provides more accurate and stable reliability estimates as data accumulates. By capturing the degradation process and adapting to evolving conditions, AHSMM strengthens prognostic robustness. This study highlights the need for robust PHM models that can handle real-world uncertainties and contribute to advancements in the aerospace, automotive, and defense industries.