The Half-Life of MOOC Knowledge

A Randomized Trial Evaluating the Testing Effect in MOOCs

Conference Paper (2018)
Author(s)

Dan Davis (TU Delft - Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science)

René F. Kizilcec (Stanford University)

Claudia Hauff (TU Delft - Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science)

Geert-Jan Houben (TU Delft - Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science)

Research Group
Web Information Systems
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1145/3170358.3170383
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2018
Language
English
Research Group
Web Information Systems
Pages (from-to)
1-10
ISBN (print)
978-1-4503-6400-3
Event
LAK 2018 (2018-03-07 - 2018-03-09), Sydney, Australia
Downloads counter
258
Collections
Institutional Repository
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Retrieval practice has been established in the learning sciences as one of the most effective strategies to facilitate robust learning in traditional classroom contexts. The cognitive theory underpinning the "testing effect" states that actively recalling information is more effective than passively revisiting materials for storing information in long-term memory. We document the design, deployment, and evaluation of an Adaptive Retrieval Practice System (ARPS) in a MOOC. This push-based system leverages the testing effect to promote learner engagement and achievement by intelligently delivering quiz questions from prior course units to learners throughout the course. We conducted an experiment in which learners were randomized to receive ARPS in a MOOC to track their performance and behavior compared to a control group. In contrast to prior literature, we find no significant effect of retrieval practice in this MOOC environment. In the treatment condition, passing learners engaged more with ARPS but exhibited similar levels of knowledge retention as non-passing learners.

Files

P1_davis.pdf
(pdf | 1.88 Mb)
- Embargo expired in 30-06-2019
License info not available