Quantum resources of quantum and classical variational methods

Journal Article (2025)
Author(s)

T.E. Spriggs (TU Delft - QuTech Advanced Research Centre, Kavli institute of nanoscience Delft, TU Delft - QN/Greplová Lab)

A. Ahmadi (Kavli institute of nanoscience Delft, TU Delft - QuTech Advanced Research Centre, TU Delft - QN/Greplová Lab)

B. Chen (Student TU Delft, Kavli institute of nanoscience Delft)

Eliska Greplová (TU Delft - QuTech Advanced Research Centre, TU Delft - QCD/Greplova Lab, Kavli institute of nanoscience Delft, TU Delft - QN/Greplová Lab)

Research Group
QN/Greplová Lab
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1088/2632-2153/adaca2
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2025
Language
English
Research Group
QN/Greplová Lab
Issue number
1
Volume number
6
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Variational techniques have long been at the heart of atomic, solid-state, and many-body physics. They have recently extended to quantum and classical machine learning, providing a basis for representing quantum states via neural networks. These methods generally aim to minimize the energy of a given ansatz, though open questions remain about the expressivity of quantum and classical variational ansätze. The connection between variational techniques and quantum computing, through variational quantum algorithms, offers opportunities to explore the quantum complexity of classical methods. We demonstrate how the concept of non-stabilizerness, or magic, can create a bridge between quantum information and variational techniques and we show that energy accuracy is a necessary but not always sufficient condition for accuracy in non-stabilizerness. Through systematic benchmarking of neural network quantum states, matrix product states, and variational quantum methods, we show that while classical techniques are more accurate in non-stabilizerness, not accounting for the symmetries of the system can have a severe impact on this accuracy. Our findings form a basis for a universal expressivity characterization of both quantum and classical variational methods.