No One Drinks From the Firehose

How Organizations Filter and Prioritize Vulnerability Information

Conference Paper (2023)
Author(s)

S. de Smale (TU Delft - Organisation & Governance)

Rik van Dijk (NCSC-NL (National Cyber Security Centre of the Netherlands))

X.B. Bouwman (TU Delft - Organisation & Governance)

Jeroen van der Ham (NCSC-NL (National Cyber Security Centre of the Netherlands), University of Twente)

M. J.G. Eeten (TU Delft - Organisation & Governance)

Research Group
Organisation & Governance
Copyright
© 2023 S. de Smale, Rik van Dijk, X.B. Bouwman, Jeroen van der Ham, M.J.G. van Eeten
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1109/SP46215.2023.10179447
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2023
Language
English
Copyright
© 2023 S. de Smale, Rik van Dijk, X.B. Bouwman, Jeroen van der Ham, M.J.G. van Eeten
Research Group
Organisation & Governance
Pages (from-to)
1980-1996
ISBN (electronic)
978-1-6654-9336-9
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

The number of published software vulnerabilities is increasing every year. How do organizations stay in control of their attack surface despite their limited staff resources? Prior work has analyzed the overall software vulnerability ecosystem as well as patching processes within organizations, but not how these two are connected.We investigate this missing link through semi-structured interviews with 22 organizations in critical infrastructure and government services. We analyze where in these organizations the responsibility is allocated to collect and triage information about software vulnerabilities, and find that none of our respondents is acquiring such information comprehensively, not even in a reduced and aggregated form like the National Vulnerability Database (NVD). This means that information on known vulnerabilities will be missed, even in critical infrastructure organizations. We observe that organizations apply implicit and explicit coping mechanisms to reduce their intake of vulnerability information, and identify three trade-offs in these strategies: independence, pro-activeness and formalization.Although our respondents' behavior is in conflict with the widely accepted security advice to collect comprehensive vulnerability information about active systems, no respondents recall having experienced a security incident that was associated with missing information on a known software vulnerability. This suggests that, given scarce resources, reducing the intake of vulnerability information by up to 95% can be considered a rational strategy. Our findings raise questions about the allocation of responsibility and accountability for finding vulnerable systems, as well as suggest changing expectations around collecting vulnerability information.

Files

No_One_Drinks_From_the_Firehos... (pdf)
(pdf | 0.975 Mb)
- Embargo expired in 21-01-2024
License info not available