Liquefaction Assessment and Soil Spatial Variation

Conference Paper (2023)
Authors

José León González Acosta (Geo-engineering)

A. P. Van Den Eijnden (Geo-engineering)

Michael A. Hicks (Geo-engineering)

Affiliation
Geo-engineering
Copyright
© 2023 J.L. Gonzalez Acosta, A.P. van den Eijnden, M.A. Hicks
To reference this document use:
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-12851-6_34
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2023
Language
English
Copyright
© 2023 J.L. Gonzalez Acosta, A.P. van den Eijnden, M.A. Hicks
Affiliation
Geo-engineering
Bibliographical Note
Green Open Access added to TU Delft Institutional Repository 'You share, we take care!' - Taverne project https://www.openaccess.nl/en/you-share-we-take-care Otherwise as indicated in the copyright section: the publisher is the copyright holder of this work and the author uses the Dutch legislation to make this work public.@en
Volume number
3
Pages (from-to)
283-290
ISBN (print)
978-3-031-12850-9
ISBN (electronic)
978-3-031-12851-6
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-12851-6_34
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Soil liquefaction is investigated considering a saturated soil deposit and by implementing standard techniques of random field theory to distribute initial void ratio values and assess liquefaction risk. The soil domain is represented in a 2-dimensional (2D) random finite element model for the dynamic analysis of coupled behavior. Multiple Monte Carlo realizations are subjected to a base acceleration, while cyclic and small strain soil behaviours are achieved through a hypoplastic constitutive model. This investigation demonstrates that 2D stochastic simulations converge to 2D deterministic simulations when small standard deviations and/or small scales of fluctuation are used. However, large standard deviations combined with relatively large scales of fluctuation may cause significant uncertainty in the response of the soil deposit. Finally, common techniques employed to assess soil liquefaction are evaluated based on the results of the deterministic and random field analyses.

Files

978_3_031_12851_6_34.pdf
(pdf | 0.803 Mb)
- Embargo expired in 01-07-2023
License info not available