Synthesis of Aero-Propulsive Interaction Studies Applied to Conceptual Hybrid-Electric Aircraft Design

Conference Paper (2020)
Author(s)

Maurice F.M. Hoogreef (TU Delft - Flight Performance and Propulsion)

Reynard de Vries (TU Delft - Flight Performance and Propulsion)

T. Sinnige (TU Delft - Flight Performance and Propulsion)

Roelof Vos (TU Delft - Flight Performance and Propulsion)

Research Group
Flight Performance and Propulsion
Copyright
© 2020 M.F.M. Hoogreef, R. de Vries, T. Sinnige, Roelof Vos
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2020-0503
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2020
Language
English
Copyright
© 2020 M.F.M. Hoogreef, R. de Vries, T. Sinnige, Roelof Vos
Research Group
Flight Performance and Propulsion
ISBN (electronic)
978-1-62410-595-1
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

This paper presents a synthesis of aero-propulsive interaction studies performed at Delft University of Technology, applied to conceptual aircraft designs with distributed hybrid-electric propulsion (DHEP). The studied aero-propulsive interactions include tip-mounted propulsion, wing leading-edge distributed propulsion and boundary-layer ingestion, combined with different primary propulsion-system arrangements. This paper starts with a description of the applied design framework and an overview of the aero-propulsive interactions. Subsequently, the different aircraft configurations are sized for a set of top-level requirements covering the range between regional turboprop to typical narrow-body turbofan aircraft. Results indicate that lower shaft power ratios show better performance, with the unoptimized DHEP concepts showing values of maximum take-off mass (MTOM) and payload-range energy efficiency (PREE) comparable to their reference aircraft. It was shown that beyond 20% shaft power ratio, the PREE decreases and MTOM increases much more than between 10% and 20%, indicating a possible local optimum between these values since even lower values did not yield any significant improvements. The benefits of tip-mounted propulsion are found to be constrained by the propeller blade tip Mach number in this particular analysis for the selected reference blade loading distribution. At the high range case for Mach 0.5, it can be seen that the distributed propulsion systems show the largest improvement.

Files

6.2020_0503.pdf
(pdf | 6.18 Mb)
License info not available