Investigation of Learning Robustness Techniques in WiFi Sensing Deep Learning Models

Analyzing the impact of various techniques on model performance

Bachelor Thesis (2025)
Author(s)

O. Grypas (TU Delft - Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science)

Contributor(s)

F.M.L. Portner – Mentor (TU Delft - Embedded Systems)

A. Asadi – Mentor (TU Delft - Embedded Systems)

RangaRao Venkatesha Prasad – Graduation committee member (TU Delft - Networked Systems)

Faculty
Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2025
Language
English
Graduation Date
23-06-2025
Awarding Institution
Delft University of Technology
Project
['CSE3000 Research Project']
Programme
['Computer Science and Engineering']
Faculty
Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

WiFi sensing has shown great promise in applications such as activity recognition, human identification, and health monitoring. However, models trained on Channel State Information (CSI) data often suffer from poor generalizability due to high variance and inconsistent reporting practices, especially in small-data regimes. Despite increasing attention to deep learning-based approaches, the community lacks standardized guidelines on handling variance and overfitting across architectures and datasets. In this work, we first review existing robustness strategies employed in related fields to identify techniques suitable for WiFi sensing. Based on this survey, we systematically benchmark five representative methods—stability training, mixup, coupled weight decay, early stopping, and label smoothing—selected for their theoretical grounding and prior success in mitigating variance. Our evaluation spans three model types (LeNet, LSTM, CNN+GRU) and two CSI datasets (Widar, NTU-Fi), using stratified 5-fold cross-validation with repeated trials to ensure reliable variance estimation. Results show that (1) stability training consistently improves moderately performing models, (2) coupled weight decay is especially effective for LSTMs, and (3) combining techniques can harm performance in near-saturated scenarios. Our findings offer actionable, architectureand dataset-specific guidelines for improving robustness and reproducibility in WiFi sensing research.

Files

Research_paper.pdf
(pdf | 0.363 Mb)
License info not available