Heritage as sector, factor and vector

conceptualizing the shifting relationship between heritage management and spatial planning

Journal Article (2017)
Author(s)

Joks Janssen (Wageningen University & Research)

E.A.J. Luiten (Ministry of Infrastructure and the Environment, TU Delft - Landscape Architecture)

Hans Renes (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Universiteit Utrecht)

Eva Stegmeijer (Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands)

Research Group
Landscape Architecture
Copyright
© 2017 Joks Janssen, E.A.J. Luiten, Hans Renes, Eva Stegmeijer
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2017.1329410
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2017
Language
English
Copyright
© 2017 Joks Janssen, E.A.J. Luiten, Hans Renes, Eva Stegmeijer
Research Group
Landscape Architecture
Issue number
9
Volume number
25
Pages (from-to)
1654-1672
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Heritage is a highly malleable concept that is constantly in flux and whose substance and meaning are continuously being redefined by society. From such a dynamic perspective, it is inevitable that new approaches and practices have developed for dealing with heritage in the context of planned development. While most scholars acknowledge the existence of various heritage approaches, one of the major defining features is often neglected: their distinctive outlook on spatial dynamics. In this article, the shifting role and purpose of heritage conservation in Dutch spatial planning is analysed. A conceptual framework is introduced that frames three approaches to the planning treatment of heritage; the sector, factor and vector approach, respectively. Although these approaches have developed in a historical sequence, the new did not replace the old but rather gained ground amongst different actors. Thus, three quite different ways of treating the past in the present now coexist in Dutch planning practice. Although this coexistence can raise conflict, we argue that contemporary heritage planning does not call for a one-size-fits-all approach, but rather for a mixed-mode model.