Performance of ambiguity-resolved detector for GNSS mixed-integer model

Journal Article (2025)
Author(s)

C. Yin (TU Delft - Mathematical Geodesy and Positioning)

PJG Teunissen (University of Melbourne, Curtin University, TU Delft - Mathematical Geodesy and Positioning)

Christian C.J.M. Tiberius (TU Delft - Mathematical Geodesy and Positioning)

Research Group
Mathematical Geodesy and Positioning
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-024-01806-4
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2025
Language
English
Research Group
Mathematical Geodesy and Positioning
Issue number
2
Volume number
29
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Teunissen (J Geod 98(83):1–16, 2024) proposed the ambiguity-resolved (AR) detection theory for GNSS mixed-integer model validation. In this contribution, we study the performance of the AR detector through analysis and simulation experiments and compare it with the ambiguity-float (AF) and ambiguity-known (AK) detectors. We describe how the detectors can be implemented and how to evaluate their performance by computing the power as functions of the model misspecifications’ size. We present two simulation experiments with single- and dual-frequency GPS models and demonstrate that the AR detector can provide a larger detection power than the AF detector, even if the success rate is not close to one. Then, we obtain power functions over 25 user locations with five observation models and 72 satellite geometries per location per model. We find that the AR detector increases the detection probability of ionosphere and troposphere delays by 47% and 60% on average when the success rate is larger than 97.5% and the level of significance is 0.01. We also find the AR detection power to be larger than that of the AF detector in case of multi-dimensional misspecifications.