Uncertainty Modelling in Life Cycle Costing Analysis for Rail Level Crossing Systems

Master Thesis (2018)
Authors

Y. Shang (TU Delft - Civil Engineering & Geosciences)

Faculty
Civil Engineering & Geosciences, Civil Engineering & Geosciences
Copyright
© 2018 Yue Shang
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2018
Language
English
Copyright
© 2018 Yue Shang
Graduation Date
31-08-2018
Awarding Institution
Delft University of Technology
Programme
Civil Engineering | Construction Management and Engineering
Sponsors
edilon)(sedra
Faculty
Civil Engineering & Geosciences, Civil Engineering & Geosciences
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Asset degradation and maintenance strategies are driving factors that cause the variation in life cycle cost (LCC) of infrastructure assets. In the railway industry, several researchers have analyzed the impact of the uncertainty on LCC, but the emphasis was laid on traditional ballasted tracks. Another type of track structure, embedded rail system (ERS), has not received much attention to date. The research screens the problem to Harmelen level crossing system (LCS), one of the applications of ERS, and proposes a reliability-based LCC model for this type of railway assets, which incorporates the uncertainty associated with rail degradation and maintenance interventions to LCC analysis in order to optimize the maintenance strategies and achieve a cost-effective life cycle management of Harmelen LCS. The model application is demonstrated in Microsoft Excel and partly validated by field data. With the rail failure data, cost information and pre-defined maintenance policies (3 conditions), the model output is able to answer two practical questions for asset managers: ‘when would be the most cost efficient to preventively replace the rails in Harmelen LCS’ and ‘how much money does one asset manager have to save to own the asset in the optimized lifecycle’. Sensitivity analysis is further performed to take more different settings into account and facilitate better understandings about the connections between model outcomes and input variables. Recommendations concerning the model application are provided both for Harmelen LCS and other types of railway assets.

Files

Uncertainty_Modelling_in_Life_... (pdf)
(pdf | 16.2 Mb)
- Embargo expired in 01-02-2020
License info not available