Quantitative evaluation of polarimetric estimates from scanning weather radars using a vertically pointing micro rain radar

Journal Article (2021)
Author(s)

Ricardo Reinoso-Rondinel (TU Delft - Atmospheric Remote Sensing)

Marc Schleiss (TU Delft - Atmospheric Remote Sensing)

Research Group
Atmospheric Remote Sensing
Copyright
© 2021 R. Reinoso Rondinel, M.A. Schleiss
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-20-0062.1
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2021
Language
English
Copyright
© 2021 R. Reinoso Rondinel, M.A. Schleiss
Research Group
Atmospheric Remote Sensing
Issue number
3
Volume number
38
Pages (from-to)
481-499
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Conventionally, Micro Rain Radars (MRRs) have been used as a tool to calibrate reflectivity from weather radars, estimate the relation between rainfall rate and reflectivity, and study microphysical processes in precipitation. However, limited attention has been given to the reliability of the retrieved drop size distributions (DSDs) from MRRs. This study sheds more light on this aspect by examining the sensitivity of retrieved DSDs to the assumptions made to map Doppler spectra into size distributions, and investigates the capability of an MRR to assess polarimetric observations from operational weather radars. For that, an MRR was installed near the Cabauw observatory in the Netherlands, between the International Research Center for Telecommunications and Radar (IRCTR) Drizzle Radar (IDRA) X-band radar and the Herwijnen operational C-band radar. The measurements of the MRR from November 2018 to February 2019 were used to retrieve DSDs and simulate horizontal reflectivity Ze, differential reflectivity ZDR, and specific differential phase KDP in rain. Attention is given to the impact of aliased spectra and right-hand-side truncation on the simulation of polarimetric variables. From a quantitative assessment, the correlations of Ze and ZDR between the MRR and Herwijnen radar were 0.93 and 0.70, respectively, while those between the MRR and IDRA were 0.91 and 0.69. However, Ze and ZDR from the Herwijnen radar showed slight biases of 1.07 and 0.25 dB. For IDRA, the corresponding biases were 2.67 and-0.93 dB. Our results show that MRR measurements are advantageous to inspect the calibration of scanning radars and validate polarimetric estimates in rain, provided that the DSDs are correctly retrieved and controlled for quality assurance.

Files

15200426_Journal_of_Atmospheri... (pdf)
(pdf | 4.03 Mb)
- Embargo expired in 01-09-2021
License info not available