Public space privatisation

are users concerned?

Journal Article (2021)
Author(s)

Els Leclercq (TU Delft - Design & Construction Management)

Dorina Pojani (University of Queensland)

Research Group
Design & Construction Management
Copyright
© 2021 E.M. Leclercq, Dorina Pojani
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1080/17549175.2021.1933572
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2021
Language
English
Copyright
© 2021 E.M. Leclercq, Dorina Pojani
Research Group
Design & Construction Management
Issue number
1
Volume number
16 (2023)
Pages (from-to)
1-18
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Academics have decried the erosion of public space under the neoliberal practices that have taken root since the 1980s in cities around the world. However, it is unclear whether users are concerned about the ownership of the urban spaces they use. To find out, this study surveyed users and observed their behaviour in three types of public spaces in Liverpool, UK: one entirely private development, one public-private partnership, and one urban renewal project taken over by a grassroots organization. The findings indicate that users appreciate privatised areas for the pleasant, clean, and safe environment they offer, as well as for the socialising opportunities. At the same time, privatised spaces send subtle signals to users that certain activities, people, or behaviours are not tolerated or encouraged. To reinforce the democratic essence of public space, values of appropriation should be safeguarded in all types of urban spaces, including privately produced ones.