Urban Fabrications

Tensile Tectonics of Labor

Master Thesis (2023)
Author(s)

M. Klimi (TU Delft - Architecture and the Built Environment)

Contributor(s)

F. Geerts – Mentor (TU Delft - Theory, Territories & Transitions)

ORG Rommens – Mentor (TU Delft - Theory, Territories & Transitions)

G. Koskamp – Mentor (TU Delft - Architectural Technology)

J.J.J.G. Hoogenboom – Mentor (TU Delft - Digital Technologies)

Faculty
Architecture and the Built Environment
Copyright
© 2023 Myrto Klimi
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2023
Language
English
Copyright
© 2023 Myrto Klimi
Coordinates
41.066461, 28.854789
Graduation Date
28-06-2023
Awarding Institution
Delft University of Technology
Project
Borders andTerritories
Programme
Architecture, Urbanism and Building Sciences | Borders and Territories
Faculty
Architecture and the Built Environment
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Filtering and differentiation at borders shape the composition and multiplicity of living labor, as well as the formation of often exploitative labor regimes. The relation between migration and the garments and textile Industry in the area of Istanbul, the center of textile and garments production and simultaneously a destination and hub for migration is exemplary of this condition. Transnational economic, labor and migration policies are reflected in the spatial manifestation of the textile and garments sector in the area of Istanbul. This leads to a heterogeneity of practices in the organization of the production system with main suppliers, subcontractors, retailers, home based worker’s networks and logistics, creating dense industry clusters extending deep into residential areas converting them into assembly lines, turning neighborhoods into machines. While technology is advancing rapidly labor conditions have remained problematic and outdated production models account for overproduction and waste.
Architecture can address these socio political and economic issues and these in turn shape architecture therefore it is worth it to make an experiment and let the systems networks and methods of garment production contaminate architecture: How is architecture transformed by using and reshuffling networks and production processes of the garment industry? What does a hybridization of these production processes and systems uncover about them? Which parameters can be manipulated for architecture to act as an agent in improving labor conditions and production processes?
This context sets the frame for discussing issues such as transitions in labor and production models, genericness, mass customization, flexibility, high-tech versus low-tech sparking a debate on how we fabricate architecture.

Files

License info not available
License info not available
License info not available
License info not available
License info not available
License info not available
MyrtoKlimi_P4_Reflection.pdf
(pdf | 0.144 Mb)
License info not available
License info not available