Understanding the role of air and protein phase on mechanical anisotropy of calcium caseinate fibers

Journal Article (2019)
Author(s)

Zhaojun Wang (Wageningen University & Research)

B. Tian (TU Delft - RST/Neutron and Positron Methods in Materials)

Remko Boom (Wageningen University & Research)

Atze Jan van der Goot (Wageningen University & Research)

Research Group
RST/Neutron and Positron Methods in Materials
Copyright
© 2019 Zhaojun Wang, B. Tian, Remko Boom, Atze Jan van der Goot
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2019.01.009
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2019
Language
English
Copyright
© 2019 Zhaojun Wang, B. Tian, Remko Boom, Atze Jan van der Goot
Research Group
RST/Neutron and Positron Methods in Materials
Volume number
121
Pages (from-to)
862-869
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Calcium caseinate dispersions can be transformed into anisotropic, fibrous materials using the concept of shear-induced structuring. The aim of this study is to further investigate the relative importance of air bubbles and protein on the mechanical anisotropy of calcium caseinate material. In this study, the effect of air on mechanical anisotropy of these fibrous materials was described with a load-bearing model, with the void fraction, and the bubble length and width as input parameters. The anisotropy of the protein phase was estimated using materials obtained from deaerated dispersions after shearing at different shear rates. We concluded that the deformation of air bubbles can only partly explain the mechanical anisotropy; the anisotropy of the protein phase is more important. Based on all results, we further concluded that the anisotropy of the protein phase was affected by the air bubbles present during the structuring process. This effect was explained by locally higher shear rate in the protein matrix during the structuring process.