Design and In Vitro Validation of an Orthopaedic Drill Guide for Femoral Stem Revision in Total Hip Arthroplasty

Journal Article (2024)
Authors

J.W.A. Klok (TU Delft - Medical Instruments & Bio-Inspired Technology)

Jessica Groenewegen (SIMtoCARE)

Olivier Temmerman (Noordwest Hospital)

Niels Van Straten (Van Straten Medical)

Bart van Straten (Van Straten Medical)

J Dankelman (TU Delft - Medical Instruments & Bio-Inspired Technology)

T. Horeman (TU Delft - Medical Instruments & Bio-Inspired Technology)

Research Group
Medical Instruments & Bio-Inspired Technology
Copyright
© 2024 J.W.A. Klok, Jessica Groenewegen, Olivier Temmerman, Niels Van Straten, Bart van Straten, J. Dankelman, T. Horeman
To reference this document use:
https://doi.org/10.1109/JTEHM.2024.3365300
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2024
Language
English
Copyright
© 2024 J.W.A. Klok, Jessica Groenewegen, Olivier Temmerman, Niels Van Straten, Bart van Straten, J. Dankelman, T. Horeman
Research Group
Medical Instruments & Bio-Inspired Technology
Volume number
12
Pages (from-to)
340-347
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1109/JTEHM.2024.3365300
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Objective: Cemented total hip arthroplasty (THA) demonstrates superior survival rates compared to uncemented procedures. Nevertheless, most younger patients opt for uncemented THA, as removing well-fixed bone cement in the femur during revisions is complex, particularly the distal cement plug. This removal procedure often increases the risk of femoral fracture or perforation, haemorrhage and weakening bone due to poor drill control and positioning. Aim of this study was to design a novel drill guide to improve drill positioning. Methods and procedures: A novel orthopaedic drill guide was developed, featuring a compliant centralizer activated by a drill guide actuator. Bone models were prepared to assess centralizing performance. Three conditions were tested: drilling without guidance, guided drilling with centralizer activation held, and guided drilling with centralizer activation released. Deviations from the bone centre were measured at the entry and exit point of the drill. Results: In the centralizing performance test, the drill guide significantly reduced drill hole deviations in both entry and exit points compared to the control (p < 0.05). The absolute deviation on the exit side of the cement plug was 10.59mm (SD 1.56) for the 'No drill guide' condition, 3.02mm (SD 2.09) for 'Drill guide - hold' and 2.12mm (SD 1.71) for 'Drill guide - release'. The compliant drill guide centralizer significantly lowered the risk of cortical bone perforation during intramedullary canal drilling in the bone models due to better control of the cement drill position. Clinical and Translational Impact Statement: The drill guide potentially reduces perioperative risks in cemented femoral stem revision. Future research should identify optimal scenarios for its application.